Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Stephen Meyer System

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Stephen Meyer System

    Hi all,

    First, many thanks to all who make of this possible.
    I hope this will be a beginning of a stone construct for massive hydroxyl production.

    I discover Stanley Meyer System in the middle 2007 and his brother job near one year later. With this second patent, I've been able to take advantages of what happen but do nothing because I'm like Saint-Thomas where he only believe what he is seeing.

    Last month, I finally start to buy some material I felt that I was near a light of verity. Three weeks ago, I had more ideas and now I want to make a Stephen Meyer cell. It's the same principle of his brother but steps are dissociated, in my own opinion.

    I need to know what is the legacy of we are sure, I mean : How to construct generators, electronic for signals and cell ?

    Everybody knows that Stephen Meyer does not answer any question : he done an interesting general interview.

    When he asked three times "why snow is white ?", I think he insisted on crystal structure of snow compared to intimate relationship of molecular water which makes them a naturaly vibrate inside themselves. The only concluded things I made is that white color reflect all the waves it can : not only the visible's one regard to spectrography spectre. Confirmed ? A wave can get through water but not in snow which is white and will not reflect the wave. Second, all material engaged is non magnetic. The waves produced to get through water will take advantage of what is called dipolary moment of the molecule which is in every atom and more particulary in sense we've got vibration.

    There are 3 symetric modes of molecular water which is not a recent discovered thing but was not knew at Faraday time. Faraday break the molecule directly and Meyers systems in a successive way. Faraday is better because it threat molecular in brute force.

    Gas production is on surface. Due to skin effect, charges are tend to the surface to. I think that the ringing process should be configured on that successive exciting process which give 3 frequencies in order of GHz. Ringing is amplified with 2 things on Stephen Meyer system : like synergy until we reach a ringing process which I call resonance too corresponding to latency time of excited molecular to be in phase for the next pulse : I mean phase for its gradualy breaking. When we study stable or unstable balance, we said that it's stable where when moved a little from its state, it tends to get back to that state. For unstable balance, we said that it's unstable if when we moved a little from its state, it tends to move more from that state.

    It's not a RLC resonance one which give a optimal current for a particular impedance but a physical one due to the time of molecular water to be in phase with next pulse who reexcite molecular water.

    On global energetic report Faraday process is evidently the lower because it simply break with brute force the molecule. Stanley and Stephen Meyer system one should be really high than Faraday energy plus energy of burned hydroxyl but it's the molecule itself that give near all energy.

    I never read clearly those concepts in any case study but I think this is done in the molecule before it breaks. After ? Hydrogen and look for another hydrogen and oxygen respectivly, very quickly I suppose, because of nature laws. Reconstruct of molecular in the same time would be really interesting but can not appends without ignition. Temperatures in presence are too low for both hydrogen and oxygen, so it does not happen.

    I would like to insist that a magnetic field, like the one made in cells are most intense outside of the conductor who created them. I think that all the reaction is done in the water, not on surface of tubes.

    After gaz is produce, it is simply in the electrostatic field so it move, but this is a inherent consequence of the building materials of the apparatus.

    Ok. I will apreciate if I have returns of all this : I hope to have been as clear as possible and give many question that only a physical construct can answer.

    So, here I am to make the job ! : )) And I need many answers to my basic questions.


    Generators : 2 motor alternator to make tri-phased signal.
    Correct ?

    Electronic : except diodes, I do not suppose it for high power. I want a modulated one to change self and capacitor value on demand connected to a computer for that purpose.
    Step by step motor to physically change value of electronics from computer connected via usb.
    Any information on electronic pc cards for that particular job is apreciate. Thanks.

    Measurement : oscilloscope and multimeter.
    Suffice ? Correct ?

    Cells : 3 pipes, in sched. norm : 1 of 1" 1/4 in 40S ; 1 of 1" in 10S ; 3/4" in 80S. This let a gap of 0,8 and 0,6 millimeter from outside, middle and inside along each contact surface.

    How does I need to prepare this ones. I saw a university link but I'm not able to retrace it : need help. This forum give a method for one electrode if I am correct. Stephen Meyer Patent use indifferently plus and minus for polarity inside and outside. Need to prepare all tube with the same method, need synthetic protocol for make the pipes. Is KOH an obliged way ?

    Need to electrolyse pipes to get rid of aluminium on surface at first, I know this.

    Does 304 to 4565 is good ? Is there is a prefered Stain Less Steel for Stephen Meyer project ? Does 316L convince ?

    Can I have aluminium to rely electric contact of concentric pipes in cell ?

    Pipes are given at 6 meters long which will make a 2 foot and 1/2 long : is-it good or bad ? Does some inner, middle or outter pipe can be same size ? Or should be different size ? In what proportion ? 50 mm up and down for each ?

    Due to magnetic field produced, we give current at 40 mm in the pipe : right ? Is aluminium convince for conducting ?

    I hope make a beginning of cell in few month : I do not pretend to be able to product more than I consume.

    Best regards.
    Thanks by advance for your attention, reading and hopefully many replies.

    Sriliam

  • #2
    The structure of snow is the same as ice... why is ice clear and snow is white?Snow is induvidual ice crystrals mixed with air in the cloud.Ice has very little air mixed within its structure.Most ice cyrstal structure is hexagonal in nature but may have a pentegonal structure depending on the surface wich its formed but generally takes on a hexagonal structure.The structure of snow with the air gaps between the crystals bounce the light around so that they combine in equal measures and find ther way out as such... It seems AIR is responsible for the color of snow.
    You can easily prove this to your self... put some clear ice n a blender.
    Last edited by NewGuy; 03-09-2010, 06:22 AM.

    Comment


    • #3
      Hi,
      Thanks for your reply NewGuy. I learned _exactly_ the same things at school : it had been a pleasure to read you. Agreed with all of your writings, so why did Stephen Meyer insist on snow and it's color ? Personnaly, I haven't got the answer except the presenting wave approach.

      Comment


      • #4
        Here is a link you might like to read...

        Forgotten In Time: The Ancient Solfeggio Frequencies

        Comment


        • #5
          Remember that snowcomb cell of Dingle`s ??

          Each corner of Stephen`s cell is a standing wave to the other .

          Why are true snowflakes ALWAYS hexagonal ?

          Snow crystals in snow flakes
          Attached Files
          Last edited by dankie; 03-08-2010, 05:22 PM.

          Comment


          • #6
            Here is a photo of snow flakes by my friend Charles Nummelin:

            Comment


            • #7
              Its more like a space useage type of thing , strongest geometry for the space ?

              Water clusters definitly hold like that under the right conditions , when they freeze its just visible .

              As for the true scientic cause under a miscroscope of light waves is what Stephen probably meant , he probably knew alot going to that but he still didnt know .

              I never could myself find out why snow is white , I dont think the real non-basic anser is on the internet .

              Comment


              • #8
                YouTube - Daniel Dingel Watercar Wasserauto 1/2

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by sriliam View Post
                  Hi,
                  Thanks for your reply NewGuy. I learned _exactly_ the same things at school : it had been a pleasure to read you. Agreed with all of your writings, so why did Stephen Meyer insist on snow and it's color ? Personnaly, I haven't got the answer except the presenting wave approach.
                  Stephen was actually try'n to help us understand wat made Stans buggy work... Stans success.
                  I'll study on another theory and may be able to give you a better reply but for starters....
                  The structure of the GAS may have something to do with it... maybe not so much the water , alltho the water structure may help a little but it seems the GAS structure is more relevant to the question why is snow white.
                  Last edited by NewGuy; 03-09-2010, 06:19 AM.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    All those who trust in that buggy are doomed , what they want is exact and specific schematics , but theres only demos and prototypes over there , the army has all the good stuff .

                    I know the buggy is a waste of time , its a dissasembled and sabotaged 49% of what was there originally .

                    Somebody visited and told me . All the people surrounding that buggy are just a bunch of scammers and amateurs that watch your every move , each time you wanna see a paper they are besides you .

                    I wouldnt give 500$ for that junk why do you think nobody wants it ? Stephen would never go so low as to actually need that buggy .

                    Everything need to start from scratch .
                    Last edited by dankie; 03-10-2010, 05:46 PM.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      All stories from that buggy poorhouse should be ignored , I dont need or want anything from that buggy poorhouse .

                      @ 2 min of that video you get to see Dingel's trunk , theres no way that the Honey comb was just put there by Dingel for no reason .

                      If its something universal , then its something that is found in nature .

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Lets see how much we really know .... how bout that
                        A Science Odyssey: You Try It: Atom Builder
                        Last edited by NewGuy; 03-14-2010, 05:19 AM.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          I cant remember do you know what 11 percent hydrogen would relate too as far as a compound is concearned? We know know Stanley said to use 11 percent air and I think if you find wat 11 percent hydrogen equates to we might find a relationship worth exploring in regards to gas structure.I may be wrong on the compound part but there is a relationship between air and hydrogen... i just dont remember wat it was.
                          Last edited by NewGuy; 03-20-2010, 02:49 PM.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            As far as the geometry is concearned does that not relate to charge/voltage ratio?

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              I dont have much to say for the moment , study the patent ... I have probably studied the patent more than anybody out there , I still got a few unanswered questons of my own ... preparation has been arduous.

                              I have my own theory on the cell itself and the node placement of those tubes . Those water has memory videos have inspired me ... what is we could create and oscillate a water superstructure of immense size by placing proper electrical forces at the nodes ... Could the B field expansion create somekind of phonon motion in resonance with all those water bonds ??

                              To answer sriliam's question , yes I believe 2 alternatores a simpler way ( depends on the tools you have ) , but I think they are certain limitations for an alternator , you will need a big gear and a motor controller to make this useable for resonance experiments . Its alot of work getting amazing electronics out to the market place when your lazy like me ...

                              Measurements , osci ... ANY osci is good

                              Multimeter check .

                              a few small cores and some wire , caps bank of 50 V range , and some vector ac knowledge , impedance knowledge , antenna knowledge . Very basic besides t antenna stuff (still learning )

                              cell , i recommend circular tubes and non plates . We are talking circular waveguides , sine waves and bessel functions .

                              I am finishing up my power amp box for my master oscillator , its a rather beefy thing all handmade , I need a bigger PCB lol

                              I had to design a power amp from scratch to get the pure sine voltage and current whatever and reactance I am also using a transformer now , 6 of them ., there was no other way I believe this needs to be in magnetic circuit ... Much more power dissipation but theres nothing perfect , still beats motors by a factor of at least 3 from my calculations on the motors ive seen @ school .

                              I am making these xformers myself , my method requires small transformers at least .
                              Last edited by dankie; 04-07-2010, 06:10 AM.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X