Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

None Electrolytic Splitting Of H2o

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Ultimate Reality by Joseph H. Cater

    Jeanna,

    The book is not a Patrick Kelly book. It's entitled, "Ultimate Reality" by Joseph H. Cater.
    It's actually a very heavy fantastic book which you do need.

    Regards,
    Slovenia



    Originally posted by jeanna View Post
    This is what I get when I click the link:

    Error

    This file is neither allocated to a Premium Account, and can therefore only be downloaded 10 times.

    This limit is reached.

    To download this file, the uploader either needs to upload the file again or first log in to his/her Premium Account and then upload the file again. The uploader just needs to click the delete link of the file to get further information.

    I hope this helps.
    If it is the Patrick Kelly book, I have it, but because of the error page I cannot know.

    jeanna

    Comment


    • #47
      Where do we start?

      Nvisser & others,

      I think we should perform a Meyer replication in as expedient a fashion as possible using just the most basic bare bones apparatus to get a good proof of concept device only. In other words just one or two tube set cell to start with. When we determine how to properly tune this arrangement and get a working prototype, we can build the cell as large and complicate as we like. In the mean time I think we need to utilize the KISS principle and keep the system as simple as possible.

      I have a good acquaintance who has expended a lot of money working on the Meyer cell system over the past several years. I'm pretty sure this fellow will help us. He'd like to get his cells working too and he has many of them. So, I'll contact him and see what can be done. I'm sure I can get him to offer some advise on where we should start.

      I don't want to trouble Michael Nunnerley to much for details which we can get somewhere else.

      Best Regards,
      Slovenia

      Comment


      • #48
        Originally posted by Michael John Nunnerley View Post
        Here I have posted a link so as you can see what is a balun and I think you will see a resemblance to both Meyer and Puharich, the latter being the most informative.

        You have to think what Puharich was doing when he stumbled on this.

        What you have to remember is that you must not have a miss match between transmitter and antenna, so in this case you have to fudge it as in this configuration of a water cell the goal posts move. With Puharich he used a sensing resistor to measure accross that resistor (1 ohm)the VSWR.

        A vertical antenna can be made to be bigger than it looks by loading with a coil, rings a bell? another answer for Farraday

        Mike
        Posted the book on my site too: http://www.tuks.nl/pdf/Reference_Mat...naCookbook.pdf

        Puharich used the sensing resistor to get a feedback signal to his modulator. I have posted the schematics of his modulator here:
        Article:Free Electric Energy in Theory and Practice - PESWiki

        What is very interesting about Puharich, is his wave form:



        He shows that at some point the wave is being rectified. At first, I thought he was doing this in his signal generator, so before his amplifier. Turns out that his WFC acts like a rectifier, pretty much as they constructed rectifiers in the old days:
        Borax or Baking Soda Rectifier and the glow.

        This rectification happens in/across the dielectric layer that is being formed on the surface of the metal of the tubes, which is very similar to what is being done in the construction of electrolytic capacitors (See Baking Soda Variable Electrolytic Capacitor.). So, what you have with these layers is basically capacitors, which can be considered to be shortcuts at HF. So, if Puharichs signals were HF, they would not be rectified by the WFC.


        Here is Puharichs block schematic:

        As you can see, coils L1 and L2 are driven out of phase from the transformer, with high voltage, zero current. So, these are to be considered open terminals of two resonating coils.

        So, the question is: at what frequency are these coils resonating? The carrier wave frequency, or at the "modulation" frequency?

        This is his modulator, which is fed by the signal from his "resonance sensing resistor":


        The circuit around transistor 71 is virtually the same as Slayers modulator, which is a derivative of Dr. Stifflers. So, this modulator is where the heterodyning takes place, and the signal going in there is nothing but a feedback of what L1 and L2 are doing.

        To me, it is pretty clear that L1 and L2 are resonating at relatively low frequencies, as Puharich says himself:
        Andrija Puharich: Water Decomposition by AC Elecrolysis >

        This Thermodynamic Device is based on a new discovery --- the efficient electrolytic fission of water into hydrogen gas and oxygen gas by the use of low frequency alternating currents as opposed to the conventual use of direct current, or ultra-high frequency current today. Such gas production from water by electrolytic fission approaches 100% efficiency under laboratory conditions and measurements.
        This electronic device has a complex alternating current output consisting of an audio frequency (range 20 to 200 Hz) amplitude modulation of a carrier wave (range: 200 to 100,000 Hz).
        So, if L1 and L2 are such that they are resonating somewhere below 10 KHz, then they should choke all HF you feed in there, so that won't reach your water, unless these are fed trough the coils trough the parasite capacitance of the windings.

        Now I don't mean to say you can't do anything with HF, but IMHO, Puharich was not driving his WFC using HF, and that's what he said too.
        Last edited by lamare; 09-22-2010, 07:59 AM.

        Comment


        • #49
          Originally posted by DrStiffler View Post
          @Michael John Nunnerley

          No problem from my end, although to do it properly you should add a stage between the Exciter and the Linear in order to match the 50ohm input impedance and depending on the linear you might have to add a bit of gain to be sure you get to the 2-5W you would need for the input.

          If anyone tries this, two cautions; your going to mess with the aircraft radio band for sure and big problems for you here if the devices are not shields properly.

          Don't go and try to connect this arrangement to any damn Tesla coils, you will never forgive yourself for doing that.
          Thank you Dr. Stiffler

          You are correct, when using linear amplifiers on all points and I can't stress the importance of shielding as I and the Doc have pointed out. Your cell anenna setup has to have a faraday cage well grounded and use good quality coax feed line and as I have said also the VSWR has to be correct or your power will reflect back into your circuit, especially using higher power outputs you will for sure blow your amp.

          If anybody builds this, and I hope they do, just start with low power output, you can up the power later. Linear amps at UHF are not cheap, at VHF not too bad, but start at low power first.

          The antenna does not have to be a tube set, you can use two separate antennas in parallel plane to one another at a specific distance "within the quarter wave length", but I can go into that later.

          The antennas can be quarter wave length and bent in a circle and end fed so as to fit inside a container. Think big for the container, 5gal would be good and should be shielded and grounded, "faraday cage". You can use aluminium or copper for the antennas if you vapour feed the water into the cell, which is the best way "greater surface area of water molecule for impact".

          My disclaimer holds on all that I post in this Forum and people will do this at their own risk, MIB's included.

          Mike

          Comment


          • #50
            Originally posted by Slovenia View Post
            Jetijs,

            Thanks for the book!!

            Best Regards,
            Slovenia
            Slovenia was kind enough to send me a copy of the book too. Thanks!

            I have uploaded it to my website, http://www.tuks.nl/, but not on any of the usual places, because this book is copyrighted pretty recently. So, you can find it if you go to the subdirectory called cache7471. It will be there for some time. Please don't spread any direct links to that directory on the net, cause if it turns up on search engines, I will have to remove it.

            I also uploaded a new pdf version of my pw article, for those interested.

            Update:

            Just scooped a bit into the book. Looks like the fellow has a lot of interesting stuff to say. Thanks Jetijs for this book!

            Also posted this here:
            http://www.energeticforum.com/renewa...tml#post111355

            If you want to discuss this book, please go over to that thread, because otherwise this thread goes to much off-topic.
            Last edited by lamare; 09-22-2010, 08:23 PM.

            Comment


            • #51
              PDF Summary of all of Mike's Info to date

              I have attached a pdf summary of all of Mike's information to date. I will continue to update it as new information is made available.

              Updated file in a later post.
              Last edited by Slovenia; 09-23-2010, 12:40 PM.

              Comment


              • #52
                Originally posted by Slovenia View Post
                I have attached a pdf summary of all of Mike's information to date. I will continue to update it as new information is made available.
                All genius and all cryptics.. and peoples that read your words as an bible..
                I suggest at all to stop your minds for an moment and recover you ideas.
                Tesla, Moray, Gray some years ago they did not have a great technology available. They had little things on hand. You don't need complicated circuits or use impossible frequencies.. You need to study an little and think ONLY with your mind. HF/HV are connected togheter and you need to adjust these to your antenna. Radiant Energy is an RADIATION and isn't ONLY an spyke! Probably Gray inside dipole tube have nitrogen or other gas that transform in atomic for obtain right radiation and use an irradiated "crystal" for obtain an great amount of electricity. You need more than one capacitor, one coil and one transformer for reach success.
                What suggest to you that?? Spark-gap transmitter - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

                And that?? Crystal radio - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

                System present in that video isn't more similat to Tesla spark gap transmitter?? YouTube - Tesla Radiant Energy

                You must only follow your brain for obtain results !!
                Last edited by tutanka; 09-22-2010, 08:22 PM.

                Comment


                • #53
                  Thanks for the links

                  Hi Tutanka,

                  I don't have your electrical aptitude, so I wish you would be much clearer with regard to your solutions to our problems. Thanks for the links.

                  Best Regards,
                  Slovenia


                  Originally posted by tutanka View Post
                  All genius and all cryptics.. and peoples that read your words as an bible..
                  I suggest at all to stop your minds for an moment and recover you ideas.
                  Tesla, Moray, Gray some years ago they did not have a great technology available. They had little things on hand. You don't need complicated circuits or use impossible frequencies.. You need to study an little and think ONLY with your mind. HF/HV are connected togheter and you need to adjust these to your antenna. Radiant Energy is an RADIATION and isn't ONLY an spyke! Probably Gray inside dipole tube have nitrogen or other gas that transform in atomic for obtain right radiation and use an irradiated "crystal" for obtain an great amount of electricity. You need more than one capacitor, one coil and one transformer for reach success.
                  What suggest to you that?? Spark-gap transmitter - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

                  And that?? Crystal radio - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

                  You must only follow your brain for obtain results !!

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    RF energy

                    Thanks Mike for your very interesting info. For those who may be thinking RF energy might not work for electrolysis of water I have some information for you. For several years it was thought the only way to energize the gases for an industrial CO2 laser was to use a spark source inside the laser gas. This caused impurities to be created which affected the reliability of the laser operation. A German company by the name of Trumph decided to try energizing the gases by applying a RF field to the gases from the outside of the laser tube. They used metal plates on the outside of the laser tube and applied high frequency RF to the plates. They were successful in creating a much improved laser. Conventional wisdom had always said this idea wouldn't work, but it did! So it seems perfectly reasonable to me that what Mike is telling us is the real deal. Just thought I would add some more info to think over.

                    Carroll
                    Just because someone disagrees with you does NOT make them your enemy. We can disagree without attacking someone.

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Originally posted by Slovenia View Post
                      Hi Tutanka,

                      I don't have your electrical aptitude, so I wish you would be much clearer with regard to your solutions to our problems. Thanks for the links.

                      Best Regards,
                      Slovenia
                      Hi Slovenia,

                      First of all you need to understand what is the right way without any confusion.
                      I have my theory about Tesla and Gray .. they have similar projects.. Tesla have found radiant energy and want create an separated transmitter/receiver. Gray have understand how the Tesla transmitter/receiver work and want created an "all in one system".

                      They use similar system for create artificial radiant energy, in all case high voltage and limited high frequency are used..

                      I have posted transmitter used from Tesla and the "natural" receiver based on galena. Galena is strange crystal that have special reaction, isn't only an natural AM diode receiver but also react to the alpha particles of radiant energy releasing electrons.

                      Have a property to convert DIRECTLY the radiation into electrical current
                      Last edited by tutanka; 09-22-2010, 09:11 PM.

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Thanks for your reply

                        Hi Tutanka,

                        Thanks for your reply. I need to study this.

                        Best Regards,
                        Slovenia


                        Originally posted by tutanka View Post
                        Hi Slovenia,

                        First of all you need to understand what is the right way without any confusion.
                        I have my theory about Tesla and Gray .. they have similar projects.. Tesla have found radiant energy and want create an separated transmitter/receiver. Gray have understand how the Tesla transmitter/receiver work and want created an "all in one system".

                        They use similar system for create artificial radiant energy, in all case high voltage and limited high frequency are used..

                        I have posted transmitter used from Tesla and the "natural" receiver based on galena. Galena is strange crystal that have special reaction, isn't only an natural AM diode receiver but also react to the alpha particles of radiant energy releasing electrons.

                        Have a property to convert DIRECTLY the radiation into electrical current

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Tubes are not needed

                          You do not need to use tubes, you can use two end fed antennas and bent into a circle so as to fit inside your WFC. Here are the sizes:-

                          VHF antenna @120mhz

                          640mm long "quarter wave length" bent into a circle.

                          UHF antenna @720mhz

                          213mm long "half wave length" bent into a circle.

                          Each antenna can be made of 1/4" copper tube, in one end fit and solder an RF female connector "as used in CB or amature radio". If laid flat on a table, bend up vertical the connection end so as the male plug and feed cable can be connected easily. There should be a space between the two ends of the antenna of about 28mm. This should give you a diameter on the VHF of about 205mm and the UHF 75mm.

                          The UHF is placed in the center of the VHF antenna and a plastic suport has to be made to hold them in this position and so as they can be suported in a horizontal plane inside the WFC.

                          This is less complicated than using tubes within tubes and is designed for cold vapour and not immersed in water. This will give better gas production, as said before a larger H2O molecular surface area. A standard humidity vapouriser can be used in the bottom of the cell to produce the vapour.

                          This is not the complicated part, but the electronics is and has to be right.

                          Mike

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            Hi Mike
                            This method sounds easy to build.
                            I got a question.
                            The coax cables from the transmitter must normally be terminated into a 50 Ohm antenna
                            If we only connect the cable to a bnc connector and only connect the centre to the copper pipe antenna and the screen of the coax stays unterminated as there is no ground plain will it not be a mismatch?
                            Or will we connect the other side of the copper circle to the screen like a TV dipole with its impedance matching circuit?
                            It also looks like each antenna will be driven by a separate transmitter with its own frequency.
                            I was under the impression that the transmitter will give a double side band, amplitude modulated signal.
                            Will it be possible to post some sort of a block diagram just to make everything clear and rule out some confusion. Then it will be easier to start from there and develop and build all the parts.

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Block

                              Originally posted by nvisser View Post
                              Hi Mike
                              This method sounds easy to build.
                              I got a question.
                              The coax cables from the transmitter must normally be terminated into a 50 Ohm antenna
                              If we only connect the cable to a bnc connector and only connect the centre to the copper pipe antenna and the screen of the coax stays unterminated as there is no ground plain will it not be a mismatch?
                              Or will we connect the other side of the copper circle to the screen like a TV dipole with its impedance matching circuit?
                              It also looks like each antenna will be driven by a separate transmitter with its own frequency.
                              I was under the impression that the transmitter will give a double side band, amplitude modulated signal.
                              Will it be possible to post some sort of a block diagram just to make everything clear and rule out some confusion. Then it will be easier to start from there and develop and build all the parts.
                              Here is the block diagram, please note the container shape, seems to work better with a conical form in relation to the antenna sizes (diameter).

                              Mike
                              Last edited by Michael John Nunnerley; 11-09-2011, 03:51 PM.

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Thank You!!!

                                Love the thread Mike.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X