New Stanley Meyer Video

[cody]

Havnt seen anyone post this yet so here it is. Very comprehensive explanation on the technology from Meyers himself.

YouTube - Stanley Meyer 1992 Interview

[Dave45]

The man was a genius, one of the greats.

[bugler]

Isn't it weird that after all these years a new video appears? (I am getting paranoid).

[Joit]

Uploaders comment

Not many people have seen this video, it surfaced a little over a month ago and as far as I know I'm the only one who has it on YouTube or any other video site. I'm currently being threaten by an individual who is claiming this is his video that I need to remove it from here and my website. So not sure how much longer this video will be up, so you guys know what that means...get it while u can and let it spread like wildfire ;-)

Hopefully some more will dig at her basement and get some more
Docs or Videos out.

[Farmhand]

Nice buggy, interesting video, it looks like a documentary type interview. Maybe recorded by some nothern european's, Dutch or Norweigen maybe something like that, anybody recognise that type of accent, just out of curiosity. Just go's to show if you tell enough people and record enough stuff, word will get out.

However it does also bring to mind the possibility that.

If Stan was very open source as we call it now, would he have even got as far as he did ?

I mean if he was developing his stuff openly it would have been reletively easy for a big company to take his idea's, throw a heap of money at it to develop it quickly, then patent it themselves and hide it. Or just threaten him sooner.

I'm no laywer but from what I gather a person or company can get an idea from seeing another persons unpatented device, then just change a few things and get a patent. It's all in the wording of the legalese type language in the patent applications I think, I might be wrong of course.

It does make me wonder sometime's though, just what some experimenters could stumble into. I know very little of what happened to Stan. I'm not sure if I want to research it, though I suppose I must.

One thing is obvious, Stan has not been forgotten.

Cheers

[Itsu]

Hi Farmhand,

you are right, the intro is in Dutch, and basically what is said is that there have been some modifications done lately, therefor the thing is not running right now, but they are allowed to take a look at it.

Regards itsu

[cikljamas]

Hi Farmhand,

you are right, the intro is in Dutch, and basically what is said is that there have been some modifications done lately, therefor the thing is not running right now, but they are allowed to take a look at it.

Regards itsu

How do you mean : therefor the thing is not running right now ?????????

The thing is not running right now because as i said today in thread that
was inspired with this video of Mayers interview :

Earth is inhabited with such a pathetic, degenerate, unsuccessful
abortions whose only skill and ambition is to destroy and kill everything and
everyone that brings good and beauty to this world !!!

Cheers !

[Karl]

Hi Farmhand,

you are right, the intro is in Dutch, and basically what is said is that there have been some modifications done lately, therefor the thing is not running right now, but they are allowed to take a look at it.

Regards itsu

Thank you for translation Itsu, I thought it was German

[Guruji]

Stan Meyer

Lets pray for Stan Soul cause he sacrificed his soul to us all to give us more freedom.
Thanks Stan

[Roland]

Lets pray for Stan Soul cause he sacrificed his soul to us all to give us more freedom.
Thanks Stan

Dude, I'm sure you had no intention to disrespect Stan's faith in what you said. But i do have to correct you never the less. His Soul is just fine, even better than fine, his Soul is at home. I think your point is to respect is life and what he sacrificed. So ill add, respect his faith also, as that becomes very obvious in this video that it was very important to him.

[kcarring]

I believe that is noteworthy the (apparent) difference between Stan Meyer's approach on technology, and that of newer firms, like Steorn / Bedini. Inventors need to have patents, and retain some right for their hard work, but, if they open up to the community, I think they potentially face less suppression. Meyers never put together a kit to show you how to trigger high voltage and thus create oxhydrogen overunity, on any scale. And thus, you don't hear of too many people with an operating Meyer's fuel cell. Probably his mistake. Whether or not you release your technology, the inner workings, to the public or not - decides ultimately - whether it is subject to full suppression, or not. True, if you go open source, some company could quickly scoop on it, patent it, and abolish it. However, it would be known, and you can friggen bet some chinese or russian firm will replicate it, sell it and not give a sh#$ whether it is patented or not. Like the IPOD. We live in a world of piracy. In this case piracy is a good thing. Pirating human potential. The sooner people realize that no one deserves this knowledge, this patent, this WAY - the sooner we move on to a higher level of concern and consciousness as a world and society. Other animals have it down, we are just slow and greedy. Now the military are likely the only ones using it. Let's hope that works out better for the J.B.'s et all, in this decade. Maybe Stanley Meyer truly believed the world would respond to the humanitarian value of his work - which would be nice, of course - but humans by and large, are not too overly concerned with the well being, of other humans, if the measuring device is $funds$ out forth for such endeavors. Nothing new though, been like that for at least this "round" of civilization.

R.I.P. Stan Meyer!

[clueless]

About 20 minutes in the video he quoted a scripture

Job 38: 22-23. Which basically says that God has reserved the treasures of snow until the time of trouble. Curious I did a little research on snowflake geometry and came to this page:
Nature's Great Piece of Art-Slash-Geometry Lesson: The Snowflake | Earth Science | DISCOVER Magazine
That contains these three patterns that stand out to me. Well I don't know how to place individual pictures here but across the top of the page is a row of snowflake patterns. The three that I tried to copy here are the 2nd, 4th, and 7th. The 4th picture resembles a lot of energy wheels I've noticed people making and the 7th looks like a coil. The 2nd picture resembles a rod. What I noticed about the 4th one (the wheel) is that it contains spokes very much like like the rod in the 2nd picture and if you look closely at the hub there seems to something that resembles coils between each spoke. Near the ends of the spokes are something that could be wires that connect with each spoke.
Now I have a question and if it is ignorant please excuse me cause I'm just learning; most of this stuff is over my head and this is my very first post. Though I have been reading a lot of the threads here and find them very enlightening.
Whoops, back to my question. What would happen if magnetic coils were placed on the inner plate and rotated under those rods, say they were copper, would that produce electricity? And if it would the current flow out to the wires? And would their be any advantage to connecting each spoke together? I sure will appreciate any of your thoughts or answers.
What I read about people doing are way over my head but I do have a lot of time on my hands from being disabled. But not a lot of money. So I need simple solutions.
I have three or four designs that have I have just seen in my head. Kind of like a vision I guess that I would love to get some feedback on but have no idea where in here to post them.
I could do it here but feel like that be hijacking the thread.
Thanks for your consideration
-Robert

[Farmhand]

Very intresting find !

Thank you very much for posting this. They are beutifull. Did you notice the picture #7 that looks like a coil also has the twin opposing vortex shapes in the center.

WOW

So does the rod. Deja Vu !

Welome Rob

[clueless]

Thanks Farmhand

What is the significance of the vortex?

[Farmhand]

Have a look through the diagrams in this book.

Walter_Russell-The_Universal_One.pdf - Windows Live

Page 192, 229, 235, also page 100, 117, 120, 127,143 and 156.

I suggest looking at the diagrams on these pages to get a quick understanding of what is detailed in this book.

here's a link to another post with some diagrams in it.

http://www.energeticforum.com/126980-post14.html


Enjoy