Tweet
@Karl
Since you think you know it all, why don't you hire a radio engineer to
build what is described? There is nothing stopping you from doing that - other
than the fact that you seem to want to sit there with a bib on your chest
while someone hand feeds you with a temperature sensitive baby spoon.
Get over yourself and leave those alone that contribute more in one post
than you have in all your posts combined.
You're posting here implying h2opower may have gotten it right but
why don't you go research his own resistance to the fact that Meyer was
using nitrogen? h2opower has on multiple occasions outright denied
that Meyer ever had anything to do with nitrogen!
Which you clearly agree with in one post with mentioning
recycled nox - just nox huh? That is laughable but in either case at least
there is a small glimmer of hope that you see nitrogen being a part of
the answer.
EDIT: "Trust me folks the Nunnerley thread will leave you waiting, it will be a long wait for a train that wont come, check back in 6 months, there may be advances
but it will come to nothing" - SO, Karl with the time frame analysis, HOW LONG has h2opower, perhaps you and others been working on the same worn out wrong analysis of Meyer's technology? Literally YEARS and what has come of it? Looks like nothing to me.
Originally posted by Karl
View Post
Trust me folks the Nunnerley thread will leave you waiting, it will be a long wait for a train that wont come, check back in 6 months, there may be advances
but it will come to nothing
but it will come to nothing build what is described? There is nothing stopping you from doing that - other
than the fact that you seem to want to sit there with a bib on your chest
while someone hand feeds you with a temperature sensitive baby spoon.
Get over yourself and leave those alone that contribute more in one post
than you have in all your posts combined.
You're posting here implying h2opower may have gotten it right but
why don't you go research his own resistance to the fact that Meyer was
using nitrogen? h2opower has on multiple occasions outright denied
that Meyer ever had anything to do with nitrogen!
Which you clearly agree with in one post with mentioning
recycled nox - just nox huh? That is laughable but in either case at least
there is a small glimmer of hope that you see nitrogen being a part of
the answer.
EDIT: "Trust me folks the Nunnerley thread will leave you waiting, it will be a long wait for a train that wont come, check back in 6 months, there may be advances
but it will come to nothing" - SO, Karl with the time frame analysis, HOW LONG has h2opower, perhaps you and others been working on the same worn out wrong analysis of Meyer's technology? Literally YEARS and what has come of it? Looks like nothing to me.
Comment