Tweet
So from all the info I gathered so far, I have come to a very promising concept of how he did all this. Last year I experimented a lot with ionicing N2 +hho and various catalysts, nothing worked at all and no wonder. I had a typical hho cell which produced h2 and o2 combined. The idea was to ionize these gasses along with nitrogen. Obviously I could not use a plasma arc or corona as that would just explode hho and turn it into water. So I tried a high power UV lamp of the category C. But it failed to ionize anything. But now I saw those hydrogen separator hho cells which separate the H2 and O2. This is a whole onther story. So lets assume that we now have thre separate sources of gas - H2, O2 and N2. H2 and O2 come from the cell and the N2 could be taken from air using nitrogen separation membranes. So, we take the hydrogen and mix it with nitrogen and have a mix of H2 and N2 now. Now we put it through a stron plasma arc. If no oxygen is present, we will break the molecular bonds and will now have H H and N N - atomic gas mixture. When the influence of the plasma arc will be gone, they will try to recombine back into molecular form. From these two gasses NH3 and N2H4 could most possibly form, NH3 is ammonia and the N2H4 is hydrazine - both are slow burning fuels, but NH3 needs a catalyst to be able to burn. Anyway, we now have a greater volume of gas than the cell alome produces, because for every three hydrogen athoms we have one nitrogen atom extra in case of ammonia and for every two hydrogen atoms we have 2 extra nitrogen atoms in case of hydrazine. This should definately work if strong enough plasma arc is used, because it is already known that hydrogen can be turned in atomic state using plasma with a high thermal energy yield when it recombines like in this picture:
I forgot the inventor of this, sorry.
Also nitrogen can be made atomic by using plasma, this is why they caution you to breath the ari around strong plasma arcs, this is not because the ozone, but because the nitrogen in the air is being converted to atomic state along with the oxygen and when they recombine, they can form some poisonous nitrogen oxide variations. So we know that plasma can "crack" both these gasses.
Next, we do exactly the same with the oxygen outlet - mix it with nitrogen and then put this mix through plasma arc. Now the same process happens, the gasses are cracked down to atomic puzzle pieces that tent to recombine together after the plasma influence is gone. Here with a bit of luck some nitrogen oxide will form, preferably N2O, which is a great booster and catalyst for burning fuel. This means that for every oxygen atom we now have two extra nitrogen atoms thys further increasing the gas volume.
After these processes we can safely mix the ammonia/hydrazine and the nitrogen oxide together forming a strong, slow burning fuel mixture that does not need any plasma sparkplugs or other boosters. This is then fed to the combustion chamber and we get the engine to run.
Ordinary hho cell wont work, you need to separate the gasses. This seems straight forward and very logical to me. I talked this over with some chemists at local university and they agree that this could work, at least chemically, the question is how efficient this process is. I have heard about guys who could run their engines with hho almost completely, with very little gasonine added, if so, why couln't it be done as I described? Engines are not ment to be run on hho which burns too fast, they need a slow burning fuel. With this method we acieve both - the increased fuel gas volume compared to pure hho and making the fuel burn slower.
So to test this, all I need is to make a small plasma chamber with two gas inlets and one outlet. I arranged a test in local solid state physics institute where they have all the needed gasses available in pressure tanks and where they also have a gas analyzer. If any trace of NH3 or N2H4 will be seen in the output gas, that means that the principle works and we need to test how efficient it is. Also based on my experience with hydrocarbon cracking I know that if you use your liter of gasoline to full extent and get all the energy possible out of it, you should be able to drive 200mpg with your average car. Because if you crack your fuel into gas state (propane, butane, hydrogen and methane) prior of burning it in the combustion chamber, you wont have any heavy hydrocarbon chains that could be left over unburned. So if you can drive 200mpg by turning your liquid fuel into gas, then why should the same efficieny not be attainable using the process I described? This is also why hho does not give you any improvement in mileage if you use it on cars that run on propane/butame mix - because there is simply nothing to help being burned, it burns on itself fully
So what do you think about this?
Jetijs
I forgot the inventor of this, sorry.
Also nitrogen can be made atomic by using plasma, this is why they caution you to breath the ari around strong plasma arcs, this is not because the ozone, but because the nitrogen in the air is being converted to atomic state along with the oxygen and when they recombine, they can form some poisonous nitrogen oxide variations. So we know that plasma can "crack" both these gasses.
Next, we do exactly the same with the oxygen outlet - mix it with nitrogen and then put this mix through plasma arc. Now the same process happens, the gasses are cracked down to atomic puzzle pieces that tent to recombine together after the plasma influence is gone. Here with a bit of luck some nitrogen oxide will form, preferably N2O, which is a great booster and catalyst for burning fuel. This means that for every oxygen atom we now have two extra nitrogen atoms thys further increasing the gas volume.
After these processes we can safely mix the ammonia/hydrazine and the nitrogen oxide together forming a strong, slow burning fuel mixture that does not need any plasma sparkplugs or other boosters. This is then fed to the combustion chamber and we get the engine to run.
Ordinary hho cell wont work, you need to separate the gasses. This seems straight forward and very logical to me. I talked this over with some chemists at local university and they agree that this could work, at least chemically, the question is how efficient this process is. I have heard about guys who could run their engines with hho almost completely, with very little gasonine added, if so, why couln't it be done as I described? Engines are not ment to be run on hho which burns too fast, they need a slow burning fuel. With this method we acieve both - the increased fuel gas volume compared to pure hho and making the fuel burn slower.
So to test this, all I need is to make a small plasma chamber with two gas inlets and one outlet. I arranged a test in local solid state physics institute where they have all the needed gasses available in pressure tanks and where they also have a gas analyzer. If any trace of NH3 or N2H4 will be seen in the output gas, that means that the principle works and we need to test how efficient it is. Also based on my experience with hydrocarbon cracking I know that if you use your liter of gasoline to full extent and get all the energy possible out of it, you should be able to drive 200mpg with your average car. Because if you crack your fuel into gas state (propane, butane, hydrogen and methane) prior of burning it in the combustion chamber, you wont have any heavy hydrocarbon chains that could be left over unburned. So if you can drive 200mpg by turning your liquid fuel into gas, then why should the same efficieny not be attainable using the process I described? This is also why hho does not give you any improvement in mileage if you use it on cars that run on propane/butame mix - because there is simply nothing to help being burned, it burns on itself fully
So what do you think about this?
Jetijs
This is exciting!
Comment