Lockridge, Unleashed!

[Vinyasi]

Sorry, I made a mistake with…

https://vinyasi.info/realsim and https://vinyasi.info/privsim

…in that I mistakenly put their internal resistances for their caps and cols in the wrong mathematical position. I put their series resistance for their inductors in their numerators when they should have been placed in their denominators when calculating their current output from the voltage difference between their two inputs (their two terminals). Likewise, I put the series resistance for capacitors in their denominators when they should have been placed in their numerators when calculating their current output from their voltage inputs across the two terminals of each component.
I should have used the mathematical placement of resistance (for resistors) as my guide for calculating the resistance of inductors since they’re also conductors…

current of a resistor = ( voltage at one terminal of a resistor minus voltage at the second terminal ) is divided by the resistance of this resistor

Alas, I did not!

If I had, then the computation for the internal resistance of coils would have looked like this …

Inductor's Series (internal) Resistance = inductance divided by (series resistance times a time interval)

Likewise, the internal resistance for capacitors would have looked like this …

Capacitor's (equivalent series) Resistance (ESR) = (time interval times ESR) divided by capacitance

Hint, a capacitor's ESR is...
Equivalent series resistance - Wikipedia

Since I can no longer recompile those JavaScript platforms for my 2017 downloaded edition of my mirrored copy of Paul Falstad’s simulator, I have to make do by calculating a deviation from my error that will compensate for my error and correct it.

Corrections to Compensate for my Erroneous Mirrors of Paul Falstad’s Electronic Simulator (vinyasi.info)

The calculation for correcting the erroneous wire gauge, in the above link, is derived from this formula on Worlfram Alpha...

function (Log10[Divide[1,Square[x]*Square[0.003125]*Power[10,Divide[y,10]]]]*10) - Wolfram|Alpha (wolframalpha.com)

...wherein 'x' is the inductance and 'y' is the wire gauge. The result of this formula is the new wire gauge to enter into the inductor's dialog box at either...

https://vinyasi.info/realsim or https://vinyasi.info/privsim

This correction increases the difficulty of simulating over-unity (which is as it should be spawning less false positives)...

https://tinyurl.com/adjustedseriesresistances

Theory of Compensation

[Vinyasi]

Electrical energy is not Energy.

Nuclear power is energy, because the emission of energy from radioactive material changes the mass of that material. This satisfies the famous equation that energy equals mass times the speed of light squared.

But a coil does not change its mass when it radiates electrical energy.

So, electrical energy cannot be energy. Instead, electrical energy is merely information.

Like a computer virus, electrical energy requires a host, namely: a circuit, that will exhibit changes of energetic state — not because energy entered the circuit or exited the circuit, but — because information entered the circuit and exited the circuit.

Hold on…
It gets worse!

We cannot deduce the magnitude of kinetic electrical energy by merely recognizing its amperage and voltage to give us Ohm’s Law resulting in power measured in watts, because electrical energy is predicated on — not only our perception of its kinetic amplitude, but also more importantly from the perspective of the energy itself — how does it perceive its kinetic amplitude?

In other words, Ohm’s Law is an oversimplification misrepresenting the situation. In reality, it’s far more complicated…

The electric utility company (who charges us a bill for our use of their electricity) has to add in the element of time in order to bill us correctly. Without time, there can be no accurate bill for our usage of electrical power. So, they bill us in terms of time. In other words, how many kilowatts did we spend within a given hour. We call this kilowatt hours of usage.

It so happens that time is merely one of the three predicates of electrical reactance formulation in which capacitance and inductance are also included. In other words, the correct determination of the measurement of electrical energy has to include capacitance and inductance along with time in order to make an accurate measurement of amps and volts. Without the inclusion of these three elements of electrical reactance, all of our measurements of the watts of power will induce a significant state of confusion to our perception of electrical energy.

Let me illustrate…

Suppose we change the interval of time (in which we are charged for our use of kilowatts on our electric bill) from one hour to one year but keep the kilowatt measurement the same. What happens? The evaluation of our bill will be totally different in a very significant way!

Just because we choose to ignore capacitance and inductance does not mean that we are avoiding dishonesty with our perception of electrical energy. We cannot include time in our measurement of kilowatts without including the other two elements of electrical reactance or else we cannot include time all by itself. In other words, we cannot have it both ways and straddle the fence of the correct measurement of kinetic electrical energy by not including the full potential of electrical energy, namely: electrical reactance in all of its facets — not merely as a facet of time, but also its facets of capacitance and inductance.

This correct perception of kinetic electrical energy by the inclusion of the potential of electrical energy in the format of electrical reactance, gives us the ability to expand or shrink kinetic electrical energy to any degree imaginable within any framework of time that we desire making it appear to the circuit that its electrical energy has become altered in a very significant way. This occurs because it is within the realm of possibility that we could encourage the development of a parasitic frequency (resulting from an input frequency) which could dominate our measurements of the amplitude of kinetic electrical energy making it look like energy came from nowhere when in fact all we did was reshape the perception of electrical energy from the standpoint of the electrical energy, itself.

This is why the software code of Paul Falstad’s electronic simulator has to include the formulae of electrical reactance in order to make a determination as to what current should result from the application of a voltage difference applied across the two terminals of either coils or capacitors.

And this is also why free energy is possible if we don’t suppress it by assuming that conservation of energy is a law requiring that we supply an electrical load with all of its energy requirements plus a little extra to spare to cover its losses. This presumption, on our part, ensures that free energy will never take place, because we will have effectively suppressed the likelihood of a parasitic frequency taking over.

Unlike input frequencies and resonant frequencies, parasitic frequencies are free to change their amplitude based on their electrical reactance. This transcends conventional wisdom which tries to maintain a steady state of kinetic electrical energy while a parasitic frequency does the opposite inducing the instability of the amplitude of kinetic energy (over time) without any significant contribution of kinetic electrical energy input.

[Vinyasi]

https://vinyasi.podbean.com/e/percep...r-conclusions/

[Vinyasi]

It's time to give it away for free since I am disappointed in my incapacity to "figure it out"...

Lockridge, Unleashed!

Found in this directory...

Index of /lockridge (vinyasi.info)