Tweet
Lockridge, Unleashed!
My self-publication of this book is not the result of having built it.
This is the result of having studied John Bedini's videotaped interview (administered by Anthony Craddock and his wife) for the "Energy from the Vacuum" series...
Energy From The Vacuum #14 : The Lockridge Device : Internet Archive
I have concluded that Bedini has given roughly all of the information which is required to build the device. The result will be a nearly 100% efficient device operating at slightly less than unity.
But, and here's the catch, the anonymous person who handed off his research to Bedini failed due to having overlooked the resistive load of incandescent lamps as any significant contribution.
It turns out, that incandescent light bulbs can generate a small amount of current if they are vacuumed of their interior atmospheric gases. This was the original invention of Thomas Edison.
Unfortunately, its filament easily burns up since 97% of the electrical energy is converted into heat in order to illuminate the light bulb using the remaining 3% of electrical energy. And the lack of gas, inside of the original Edison design, fails to transfer the energy of the filament to the glass enclosure. So, all of the energy is sequestered to concentrate at the filament causing it to readily fry itself.
Yet, it is this concentration of energy which motivates the filament to generate a small amount of current. It is this marginal generation of current which can contribute to any machine which possesses nearly 100% efficiency since none of this miniscule contribution will be wasted in attempting to bring the efficiency of that device up to 100% and, instead, will become capable of tipping the coefficience of performance to slightly greater than unity.
For whatever reason, Irving Langmuir invented a variation of the Edison device in 1913 by filling his incandescent bulbs with argon or a combination of argon and nitrogen at ambient (atmospheric) pressure. This succeeds at transferring some of the excess energy sequestered at the filament to the glass enclosure and preserve the lifespan of the filament for a little while longer at the expense of our utilization of light bulbs in any overunity device.
The glass enclosure of a light bulb doubly serves as the dielectric of a spherical capacitor. The environment surrounding the glass enclosure is the outer plate of this spherical capacitor (stretching outwards to an infinite radius) while the filament is the inner plate of this capacitor. If there are any molecules of gas inside of this bulb, it will assist in the transfer of energy away from the filament and deposit this transfer of energy at the glass enclosure and, thus, lengthen the lifespan of the filament with the additional benefit of thwarting the filament from generating any appreciable quantity of current.
The simulated models of Paul Falstad's incandescent lamps are of the vacuum variety. Their heat sends a substantial quantity of current ...
https://tinyurl.com/lockridge5
... back to his transformer model which also has the property of being an "ideal transformer" since it retains its magnetism at a rate of 100%.
https://falstad.com/circuit/e-transformerdc.html
His capacitors do likewise. They retain their dielectric force with 100% efficiency.
These lamps, of Paul Falstad's simulated modeling, produce current all of the time even when they're not hot and, thus, even when they're not radiating any light. It's just that their production of current skyrockets the instant their Kelvin thermal index reaches white hot status. Then, my initial attempt at crudely simulating a Lockridge device (Lockridge5, linked-to above) can't help itself but suddenly blow up making its regulation and impossible affair.
This risk of explosions would not happen in the real world. Or, would they?
Every single detail of the Anthony Craddock interview of John Bedini, concerning the architecture of the Lockridge device, must be adhered to and you must ignore anyone else's building suggestions no matter what their credentials.
Good luck!
My self-publication of this book is not the result of having built it.
This is the result of having studied John Bedini's videotaped interview (administered by Anthony Craddock and his wife) for the "Energy from the Vacuum" series...
Energy From The Vacuum #14 : The Lockridge Device : Internet Archive
I have concluded that Bedini has given roughly all of the information which is required to build the device. The result will be a nearly 100% efficient device operating at slightly less than unity.
But, and here's the catch, the anonymous person who handed off his research to Bedini failed due to having overlooked the resistive load of incandescent lamps as any significant contribution.
It turns out, that incandescent light bulbs can generate a small amount of current if they are vacuumed of their interior atmospheric gases. This was the original invention of Thomas Edison.
Unfortunately, its filament easily burns up since 97% of the electrical energy is converted into heat in order to illuminate the light bulb using the remaining 3% of electrical energy. And the lack of gas, inside of the original Edison design, fails to transfer the energy of the filament to the glass enclosure. So, all of the energy is sequestered to concentrate at the filament causing it to readily fry itself.
Yet, it is this concentration of energy which motivates the filament to generate a small amount of current. It is this marginal generation of current which can contribute to any machine which possesses nearly 100% efficiency since none of this miniscule contribution will be wasted in attempting to bring the efficiency of that device up to 100% and, instead, will become capable of tipping the coefficience of performance to slightly greater than unity.
For whatever reason, Irving Langmuir invented a variation of the Edison device in 1913 by filling his incandescent bulbs with argon or a combination of argon and nitrogen at ambient (atmospheric) pressure. This succeeds at transferring some of the excess energy sequestered at the filament to the glass enclosure and preserve the lifespan of the filament for a little while longer at the expense of our utilization of light bulbs in any overunity device.
The glass enclosure of a light bulb doubly serves as the dielectric of a spherical capacitor. The environment surrounding the glass enclosure is the outer plate of this spherical capacitor (stretching outwards to an infinite radius) while the filament is the inner plate of this capacitor. If there are any molecules of gas inside of this bulb, it will assist in the transfer of energy away from the filament and deposit this transfer of energy at the glass enclosure and, thus, lengthen the lifespan of the filament with the additional benefit of thwarting the filament from generating any appreciable quantity of current.
The simulated models of Paul Falstad's incandescent lamps are of the vacuum variety. Their heat sends a substantial quantity of current ...
https://tinyurl.com/lockridge5
... back to his transformer model which also has the property of being an "ideal transformer" since it retains its magnetism at a rate of 100%.
https://falstad.com/circuit/e-transformerdc.html
His capacitors do likewise. They retain their dielectric force with 100% efficiency.
These lamps, of Paul Falstad's simulated modeling, produce current all of the time even when they're not hot and, thus, even when they're not radiating any light. It's just that their production of current skyrockets the instant their Kelvin thermal index reaches white hot status. Then, my initial attempt at crudely simulating a Lockridge device (Lockridge5, linked-to above) can't help itself but suddenly blow up making its regulation and impossible affair.
This risk of explosions would not happen in the real world. Or, would they?
Every single detail of the Anthony Craddock interview of John Bedini, concerning the architecture of the Lockridge device, must be adhered to and you must ignore anyone else's building suggestions no matter what their credentials.
Good luck!
Comment