Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

MOSFET RF power amplifier design

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Buddhafollower
    replied
    Indeed it is a BJT.
    Please look at this schematic and at the calculations and tell me if they are OK.
    Obviously the two transformers are wound on ferrite material 43 or another type.
    It is more like a class AB than class B.
    I had no idea how to calculate the voltage gain Av and the current gain Ai to get the power gain Ap so I just put a power of 100W. Anyway I think it's close enough. I have seen many RF amplifiers of this nature and they had two 200W transistors and still their power was 100W. To calculate the first two gains i need to know the Av of the stage and i simply have no way of knowing that. What i'm i supposed to do, assume a certain Av? I don't think that is going to work.
    It depends on the input voltage Iv and output voltage Iout. A ratio of Iout/Iin. This amplifier isn't even built so, again I have no idea. To calculate such values you've got to be a real electronics engineer not like me a mushroom .
    Attached Files
    Last edited by Buddhafollower; 07-09-2021, 12:52 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • spacecase0
    replied
    the 2SC3264 seems like it is good to 40MHz
    but it is a bipolar transistor and not a mosfet

    Leave a comment:


  • Buddhafollower
    replied
    Please look at this datasheet of the bipolar transistor 2SC3264. Do you think that in a class B configuration this will be able to achieve at least 7MHz? 10.15 MHz?
    It is strange because it has a very high transition frequency...
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • Buddhafollower
    replied
    The ''S'' I believe stands for ''Siemens'' and it is a measure of Admittance. Here Dr. Dollard puts it like this.
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • spacecase0
    replied
    yes, mosfets are voltage devices for the input, and the output is equivalent resistance ( and is clearly set by that voltage on the input).
    how you get the required voltage in is that you look at the gain required and calculate from the data sheet on the part.
    the gate-source voltage absolute limit is 20V ( + or - )
    gate threshold voltage for that mosfet is listed as Min. 2V Typ. 2.9V Max. 4V
    and that is why you need an adjustment for the bias voltage for each mosfet in the circuit, none of them are quite the same.
    as far as how much voltage turns on the mosfet past that point,
    there is going to be a saturation voltage that turns it on and more voltage does not help,
    by the graph it looks like that is somewhere near 8V depending on your current through the device
    so about the most AC signal you want in would be 4V peak (not RMS) (4V bias plus the 4V peak in get you 8V, and you are not going to need more than that for this part)
    so knowing that you need less than 4V PTP in, how much less ?
    there is the actual gain, they call it Forward Transconductance in the specifications... and that number is 35 with the min. being 25, no max value is listed...
    the units are "s" and I just have no idea about it, I did read it all at one point, but it did not make sense to me,
    I guess that figuring out a unit for a voltage in that relates to an equivalent resistance out is not going to end up with units that make sense.
    so I just ignore the value and go look at the typical Characteristic graphs in the specification shet as that has the information I am looking for.
    and testing with a signal generator gets you your number quite fast.

    remember that bipolar transistors are not the same at all, they are current in that is setting current out with a gain amount. easier to figure out the math, but more annoying to design circuits for.

    Leave a comment:


  • Buddhafollower
    replied
    As for the division, you know very well I had no choice. It does work though.

    Leave a comment:


  • Buddhafollower
    replied
    Is it all just a matter of voltage value to the gates of the mosfets? That's why this number of turns in the secondary? Let us forget about matching impedances a little. So how exactly I can determine the voltage that will go to the gates? This is of course an AC signal so it is stepped down by the transformer. But why is so and how can I calculate the voltage values? I guess that depends greatly on the output of the driver. In certain cases can someone design a step up transformer or are thay all step down ones?
    Thank you,

    Leave a comment:


  • spacecase0
    replied
    5:2 refers to 5 turns on the primary and 2 turns on the secondary.
    the ratio of 5/2 is 2.5, but that is for voltage and not impedance
    impedance ratio = turns ratio squared.
    and that would be 6.25 for the 5:2 transformer
    and looking at your math, you are dividing the wrong direction,
    the lower number of turns will have the lower impedance.
    so the 2 turn side is 8 ohms if the 5 turn side is 50 ohms.
    the 2 turn side is run it into a 10 ohm resistor, so that gets it all pretty close without the mosfets even being connected.
    the mosfets are an additional load, so it lowers that 10 ohm number a bit (the target being 8 ohms)

    the reason why they do all this is that radio waves in a circuit will bounce back if they hit an impedance that is not the same as where it came from.
    the more the impedance mismatch the more of the radio wave is bounced back.
    radio waves coming back into the input can do bad things
    so, you have to set up the input of the amplifier to match your source.
    and transformers can't easily be made with partial turns...
    you also can't have to many turns or you can over magnetize the core...
    so you might not have ratios like 12:3 (that might be a closer number match for this circuit)
    so there are limits.
    the impedance of the mosfet input is reasonably high,
    so they needed additional load (the resistor)
    and they needed the voltage in to the gate of the mosfet to be in the correct range, and this also sets the turns ratio of the transformer.
    so whoever designed this circuit likely choose values that are close enough for a wide range of conditions
    designing is all about tradeoffs, and this circuit is not bad at all.

    make sense now ?

    Leave a comment:


  • Buddhafollower
    replied
    Yes, well... I guess you are right. I did the calculation for the 30m band, meaning 10.15MHz, and indeed the ratio is 2.5. But still I know not how they picked the 5:2 number of turns. If I divide 50Ohm by 2.5 I get 20. So I guess that will be the ''2''. Or you round it up to the nearest full number. And then you have 2.5*2= 5 turns. So we will have in the primary 50Ohm, 5 turns and in the secondary, 314.46Ohm, 2 turns.
    You have to know that I divided the bigger impedance by the smaller (50Ohm). I had no other choice.
    Please correct me if I'am wrong.

    .........
    And still I do not understand. From where is this 5:2 number of turns? So 4 divided by 2.5 is 1.6 and it doesn't work well enough. Then 5:2.5= 2. So 5:2.
    But then another question arises in my unripened mind, which is why is the secondary of 'two turns' supplying the gates of the mosfets with signal? I don't get it.
    I guess that you will feed a smaller inductance to a higher impedance.
    Last edited by Buddhafollower; 07-06-2021, 04:53 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Buddhafollower
    replied
    In the above image of the amplifier I got an input impedance of the mosfets of 31.84Ohm( at the frequency of 1MHz). The ratio of the transformer will be 1.253 from my calculation. What I don't understand is where did they get the 5:2 turns? You said the ratio is 2.5 but I still don't understand... I don't understand what is the purpose of that resistor parallelled with the secondary of the input RF trafo and how exactly is that going to set the input impedance since I done the math and got a totally different thing?

    Leave a comment:


  • spacecase0
    replied
    the capacitor is in there because you need to isolate the DC for the bias voltage,
    they chose a value that is 25 times the gate capacitance, that is large enough not to loose much.
    you could choose larger value, but there is no point, and you just risk DC leakage.

    Leave a comment:


  • Buddhafollower
    replied
    I was thinking that they put they two 100nF capacitors there in order to slightly decrease the gate capacitance. That's why I had drawn them like that in the second image. This value of capacitance is appropriate for the frequency they use also decrease the input impedance of the mosfets a little. That's what I think. That's how I see the problem. They chose a value that will have a low reactance at certain frequencies.

    Leave a comment:


  • spacecase0
    replied
    your second image seems to be correct to me.
    the 10 ohm resistor in there is going to set most of the input impedance
    and with that 5:2 transformer... (2.5 (turns ratio) squared gets you impedance ratio, so 10ohms times 6.25)
    is that 62.5 ohms in for just the resistor and transformer,
    and it is lowered by the 4.72nF to ground, but that will change with frequency,
    so, my guess is they are trying for about 50ohms in with that circuit (as that is a very common input number in radio electronics.
    and likely your signal generator is 50 ohms out as well (all of mine are).

    Leave a comment:


  • Buddhafollower
    replied
    You see in this image there are two capacitors at the input of the amplifier. Two capacitors of 100nF after the secondary of the signal transformer. How do I calculate their values? If i follow the example you gave me with the input impedance, there will be two capacitors of the mosfets in series with these two capacitors of 100nF. Is it accurate?
    In this second image that I uploaded i specified how I see things.

    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • spacecase0
    replied
    there are ways to match impedance very closely,
    this is just one page that seems to talk of popular ways
    https://www.hamradiosecrets.com/home...nna-tuner.html

    if you have impedance that changes all the time, there are ways to deal with that as well, but hopefully you don't have that going on.

    seems like you are mostly set to do what you want to do.
    good luck and I will answer more questions if you have any.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X