I have joined this forum mostly because of the information on renewable energy. I am optimistic that this millenimium will be the one that humanity will become truly free. Free in what we say, free exchange of ideas, free energy and free to use technology like we want to.
Today we have many more ways people can communicate with each other. So much so that the world have been called a "global village" and fast, free electronic communication the "information super-highway". I wonder, indeed, what our limitations are with all these advancements? Somewhere in the movie "Contact" the priest (Palmer Joss/Mathew McConaughy) in the story says "Is the world fundamentally a better place because of science and technology? We shop at home, we surf the Web... at the same time, we feel emptier, lonelier and more cut off from each other than at any other time in human history..." <looked up the exact quote>
I want to ask the question why should this be, that we become more distant from one another? We should remain the masters of technology and should not let technology rule us and take over our lives. We do need to carefully plan the ways we utilise technology; it is clear the old labour driven economies of yesteryear is behind us although countries like China still employs many industry workers. But once technology becomes more economically feasible many industries close down; this should be foreseeable.
Where are all our great visionaries and leaders that they never seem to adequately address the repercussions of such paramount changes. Work should be exciting and one should have a sense of accomplishment doing ones job well, but if most jobs are reduced to assembly line of work where some higher power decide the output and constraint of our working environment then I can scarcely see the point of human history. To me that is that progress is good and that change is inevitable; but due to various reasons of human psychology our so-called leaders have ongoing popularity contests about having more power, wealth than their rivals and this extends well into all national governments.
*Disclaimer* This is my view of the world as it is and is not indicative of me having a high fidelity to reality. I don't intend to back up any of what I say with fact and figures at this point and I leave it to whomever reads this piece to agree or disagree to whatever statements I make. With more thoughtful prodding and debate I definitely will try to make more substantive arguments about any particular statements, hopefully using real facts and figures.
--The end of a really long-winder closing statement--
Today we have many more ways people can communicate with each other. So much so that the world have been called a "global village" and fast, free electronic communication the "information super-highway". I wonder, indeed, what our limitations are with all these advancements? Somewhere in the movie "Contact" the priest (Palmer Joss/Mathew McConaughy) in the story says "Is the world fundamentally a better place because of science and technology? We shop at home, we surf the Web... at the same time, we feel emptier, lonelier and more cut off from each other than at any other time in human history..." <looked up the exact quote>
I want to ask the question why should this be, that we become more distant from one another? We should remain the masters of technology and should not let technology rule us and take over our lives. We do need to carefully plan the ways we utilise technology; it is clear the old labour driven economies of yesteryear is behind us although countries like China still employs many industry workers. But once technology becomes more economically feasible many industries close down; this should be foreseeable.
Where are all our great visionaries and leaders that they never seem to adequately address the repercussions of such paramount changes. Work should be exciting and one should have a sense of accomplishment doing ones job well, but if most jobs are reduced to assembly line of work where some higher power decide the output and constraint of our working environment then I can scarcely see the point of human history. To me that is that progress is good and that change is inevitable; but due to various reasons of human psychology our so-called leaders have ongoing popularity contests about having more power, wealth than their rivals and this extends well into all national governments.
*Disclaimer* This is my view of the world as it is and is not indicative of me having a high fidelity to reality. I don't intend to back up any of what I say with fact and figures at this point and I leave it to whomever reads this piece to agree or disagree to whatever statements I make. With more thoughtful prodding and debate I definitely will try to make more substantive arguments about any particular statements, hopefully using real facts and figures.
--The end of a really long-winder closing statement--
Comment