This forum is preserved as a permanent archive. The community continues at eMedia Press.
If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Just a thought, but would it be more efficient (ie more usable energy) to use a "Tesla Turbine" to convert the compressed air into rotational energy rather than a "piston" type design? Allegedly Tesla claimed efficiency of up to 95% (link: Tesla turbine - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia).
It appears that piston-in-cylinder type engines inherently waste energy by the piston (and push-rods) having to change directions twice with each complete stroke.
Comment