Transients are a Potentially Useful Source of Freely Available and Reusable Energy

[Pot head]

Old cereal

A box of lucky charms for milk toast vinesmashy.

[Vinyasi]

It'll take me a lifetime to self-learn electrical engineering sufficiently enough ...

... to be able to explain what I've managed to stumble my way through on the simulator in record time.

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cCJcU7INwnU&t=2h35m2s[/VIDEO]

But I'm lucky - in a sense - for having had a very strong distaste for taking Electronics 101 in college due to all of the math which we were presented with the very first day of class. Twice, I tried to take the class, and twice I failed to want to stay. Even a pair of pretty girls who wanted to be my lab partners failed to entice me.

It took watching an old VHS of "An Officer and a Gentleman" with Louis Gossett Jr. and Debra Winger and Richard Gere to wake me up to the leveraging effect and the opportunity just waiting for me to take advantage inherent within the safety of a simulator (given that the movie depicted the use of a flight simulator to help train their cadets how to extricate themselves from the cockpit of a plane downed in water without drowning themselves in the process).

Those attempts at taking electronics classes were way back in the 1980s. I didn't see the Debra Winger movie for the second time until 2017. Wow! I can be slow to move my butt!!

I have enough vital force left in me to handle the light stress, here. But I'm too burnt out to take it full, and in my face, anymore. So in a sense, I'm sorry I waited so long.

But in another sense, I've matured to the point that I see adversity as an opportunity to make self-inquiry to discover new knowledge I wouldn't have discovered otherwise had I not been challenged (heckled) to do so.

So, I put it to good use and reposted a redrafted version of...
A Theoretical Explanation of How Free Energy Operates in our Universe

Thank you, Pot Head, for your voracious appetite for life. Some of it rubbed off onto me!

And, thanks Boguslaw for that image of C. Earl Ammann standing in front of his battery-free EV. It's worth gold!

[Pot head]

[Vinyasi]

Beating the Physicist's Conservation of Energy Law

Visit...
vinyasi.info/realsim?startCircuit=energy-synthesis.txt

I've updated it. For by rereading it, I realize that a bunch of attorneys wrote the Physicist's Conservation of Energy Law. And then Einstein went and misrepresented that law to us by giving us a false sense of enlarged difficulty as to how to play with it and requiring a huge government grant for nuclear physics experiments when my simple circuit accomplishes it.

Like any good attorney, the truth is hidden in plain sight. Ergo, it has a loop hole in it....

It's not as complicated as Einstein has led us to believe. When performing mind-blowing time dilation thought experiments using a pair of twins and sending one away in a rocket at nearly the speed of light, no such fantasy is required. The following illustrates how easy it is to "beat" this law.

Shifting the voltage versus the current sine waves of A/C electricity is sufficient enough to dilate time RELATIVE TO EACH WAVE BY COMPARISON TO EACH OTHER'S VIEWPOINT.

Isn't that what the two twins experiment was all about? Shifting their points of view regarding their individual time-frames relative to one another? !!!

And if the shift skips past a mere 90 degrees of zero power factor all the way to 180 degrees of separation, then we will have succeeded in dilating time in a manner that does not decompose electricity into its constituent ingredients. This decomposition occurred with the Trans-Atlantic Telegraph Cable in the latter part of the 1800s, but was solved by Oliver Heaviside by wrapping the copper core of the oceanic cable with iron ribbon or iron wire to boost the magnetic portion of the signal which had been decaying. The electrostatic portion had been doing fine. But it takes both halves to make a whole of electricity.

Electrical engineers have been doing all along the decomposition half of Eric's electrical theory (whenever a transmission line's power factor shifts to zero). By comparison, Eric keeps telling us he has done BOTH TYPES OF MANIPULATION.

See what a trick it has been for the attorneys, turned physicists, have misguided us yet again by translating Eric's "decomposition of electricity into its constituent ingredients" into the electrical engineer's phrase of: "zero power factor"!!!!!

It's that simple provided that it doesn't cost us more than the outcome to accomplish this. Op-amps are always given to us as an example of how to shift voltage relative to current by 180 degrees.

Magicians love to misguide our attention away from what's really good to know! Because opamps will cost us too much to accomplish what I can do using mere micro volts and nano amps undergoing simulation in my circuit....

My non-theory English and Spanish "Extending the Range of an EV...etc" books at Amazon and Payhip manages to fulfill these requirements...

http://amazon.com/author/vinyasi

Vinyasi - Payhip

[Vinyasi]

Tesla's Magnifying Transmitter is Monopolar since it is Grounded in Counter-Space....

...for its Reference.

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I0Qqi3vtQok&feature=youtu.be[/VIDEO]

Eric quote...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TttHkDRuyZw&t=2h4m21s

Vinyasi - Payhip

http://amazon.com/author/vinyasi

[Pot head]

You are a spammer.

[Vinyasi]

Tesla's Special Generator and Pierce-Arrow Demonstration of 1931

Most solar powered devices run off of a battery of energy storage cells rather than taking electricity directly from the solar panel. The solar panel recharges the battery and the solar powered device runs directly from the battery. Yet, my design requires so little power that I can get away with eliminating all batteries! Instead, I take electricity directly from a micro mini, solar panel powering a high frequency, sine wave generator at a cost derived from the ambient lighting surrounding this device.

Since I run off of inspiration, I haven't had much to say concerning Tesla's Pierce-Arrow. But I've been busy writing a book on a motorized transformer - as well as translating it into Spanish to help with my grammar - which led to this present insight: that Tesla's Special Generator is the solid-state version of Tesla's Pierce-Arrow demonstration of 1931.

Byron Brubaker is a cool guy. Trained as an electrical engineer, confidant to Joseph Newman, and going by the moniker of MX6Maximus on YouTube and Facebook, has given me a few gems of electrical wisdom during our conversations. One is a variation of the Tesla Pierce-Arrow story which I've never heard before...

The reason why Peter Savo was asked to accompany Tesla to Buffalo, New York, was - not to serve as a witness, but - to keep an eye on the pressure gauge on the dashboard and notify Tesla the moment it rose beyond a certain safe limit. Byron claims he was pressurizing a condenser (called, capacitors nowadays) utilizing this patent, called: “Nikola Tesla U.S. Patent 577,671 - Manufacture of Electrical Condensers, Coils and Similar Devices”.

I didn't have the opportunity to use this concept in any of my simulations until now.

By assuming that pressurization of the dielectric material of a capacitor equates to its increase of equivalent series resistance, raising a capacitor's series resistance in Micro-Cap led to a greater stability of the circuit I was working on, yesterday, intended for my latest book linked to, above.

The problem I was having was that the circuit, in the course of adding more components to its simulation to enable successful rotation of a motor shaft, was exploding to infinite gain as a runaway surge condition. That was merely one type of error the simulator gave me, calling it: “Matrix is singular”. {I've had to learn by trial and error what Micro-Cap's cryptic messages mean to me instead of whatever its software designers intended them to mean!} The only way to prevent this error from occurring was to make a capacitor into a generator to serve as a voltage regulator. {The removal of this capacitor was the easy way to solve this problem. Yet, its inclusion ironed out the spiky gaps in the D/C output at the motor (load) coil and was the whole point to its necessity.} Since adding equivalent series resistance to a capacitor is the same as converting the capacitor into a current source (by way of it becoming a negative resistor), this led to the suppression of any new surge in this isolated section of the overall circuit. And since the circuit was already inspiring the creation of a surging condition elsewhere and under stable management, I didn't need any new instigation to destabilize an otherwise stable condition. Hence, the need for increasing the resistive presence of this peculiar variation of a capacitor. HINT..... I had to raise what would normally be my default series resistance for ceramic capacitors of 10 milli-Ohms to an unthinkable Mega-Ohm if it weren't for Byron's discussion to me several weeks ago.

This did the job. I simulated a ten second duration taking hours of computer time and consuming 4 Giga-bytes on my harddrive to store the simulator's data file for tracing the circuit's oscilloscope output.

At one kilo-Ohm of ESR, the simulator succeeded at calculating a 300 milli-second duration. But when raised to ten seconds, it bombed out with its standard error message indicating to me that I had to raise the ESR yet again by an arbitrary factor of one thousand (for convenience's sake).

So, I don't know if 1 Meg-Ohm is necessary or I might get away with something smaller, such as: 100 kilo-Ohms or 10 kilo-Ohms? I really don't care at this point.... The fact is, I succeeded with my quest to make my design for an overunity circuit capable of turning a motor shaft.

[Vinyasi]

Tesla's Special Generator is analogous to his Pierce-Arrow Demonstration of 1931

I discovered, today, while responding to Chris Bake on Facebook, that there are two important analogues to the regulation of a run-away surge to prevent it from becoming a merely brief transient when it attempts to escalate its synthesis of electricity toward an infinite gain and destroy its hosting circuit along with itself.

It validates the mirrored reflections of the dielectric field and magnetism, as Eric says they are.

One is the pressurization of condensers, for which Tesla both sought and received a patent for: Nikola Tesla U.S. Patent 577,671 - Manufacture of Electrical Condensers, Coils and Similar Devices. This will prevent dielectric saturation of the capacitor's dielectric material. This is emulated by simulators by increasing a capacitor's equivalent series resistance.

The analog for inductors is what William Lyne has given us in chapter 18 of his book, entitled: "Pentagon Aliens". Quoting Tesla, William says that: "for every two hundred pounds of iron added to his Special Generator, one horsepower is added to its output". So, William surmised that this implies that a large magnetizable mass (such as the hull of a German Elektro-U-Boat used by the Nazis during WWII) was magnetically coupled to the armature of the large horseshoe pair of coils in what Thomas Commerford Martin describes in the last chapter, chapter 63, of his book, entitled: "The Inventions, Researches and Writings of Nikola Tesla".

Yet, I suspect that this is why Tesla chose the massive American luxury car, the Pierce-Arrow, since it would possess a large magnetizable chassis since he was diffusing the magnetic core saturation of his main motor coil/s (the inversely, inductive analog to the pressurization of capacitors).

I assume an inverse relationship since the mathematical modeling within an electronic simulator involves the creation of a current source for approximating the current passing through inductors and capacitors. And this current source is modeled exactly inverted (mathematically reciprocal) to each other. So, each mathematical statement is the equivalent of the other after first dividing either one into the number one.

Talk about Eric claiming that each of the two constituent ingredient forces of electricity are the complete denial of the other!

To quote a chapter from out of my latest eBook, "Tesla's Special Generator and Pierce-Arrow Demonstration of 1931"...

claimedUS # 577671, merely claims the use of pressure during their formation; not during their use). Simulators are able to emulate this by allowing for the increase of their equivalent series resistance. Unlike limits imposed upon entering values for mutual inductance among coils (known as their coupling coefficient) beyond that of positive or negative unity (in order to adhere to conventional applications of electrodynamic theory), there is nothing to prevent the entering of, what may appear to be, a ridiculously high value for a capacitor's series resistance during its simulation. See, http://is.gd/eqseressole source we have for this technique of preventing magnetic coil-core saturation concerning Tesla's Special Generator when applied to the hull of a Nazi Elektro-U-Boat. It has never been tested, otherwise.

I'm just following this logic, when applied to both components, to draw analogous conclusions despite their speculative (and inconclusive) nature (by conventional standards of collective ignorance).

For all I know, I may be spot on!

[Vinyasi]

From where does free energy come? The same place where energy comes from.

Energy comes from the 'Now" derived from a little bit of the past plus a little bit of the future. The result of this summation is a fictional standing wave of zero movement oblivious to the Laws of Thermodynamics and exhibiting a negative power factor of unity, or nearly unity.

https://payhip.com/b/9vER

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6rqX1iaVTwc[/VIDEO]

[Vinyasi]

Time is Another Source for Electrical Energy Besides the Electric and Magnetic Fields

MP3 audio notes for this chapter = Vimeo video notes for this chapter

Where does Electricity Return to When it is Decomposed?

When electricity is decomposed back into its constituent ingredients of time, magnetism and dielectricity (aka, electrostatics), it returns to a mathematical condition of the complex number field. This is electrodynamically accomplished via the zero power factor. This is biologically accomplished via unstressing during meditation or a
The Law of the Conservation of Energy covers all energy. Yet, the Laws of Thermodynamics

bladeless turbine plus his valvular conduitenergy is not conserved if time should shiftinterpretation of thermodynamics has failed us along with the application

[Pot head]

Simple minded

Simply put energy is never lost it is only transformed.

[Pot head]

Vinyasi

I figured you out.
You go all the way around your hand to get to your thumb.
Just use simple examples in explanations.
Make each step a step towards the complete build.
When you finally build a working unit, I will have respect for the time used.
What is it you are building?

[Vinyasi]

I don't understand the laws of thermodynamics. [ON HOLD] (-2 votes cast: too broad)

I have a problem understanding...

How do the laws of thermodynamics explain a negative power factor whenever achieved via the interference of two waves of opposing zero power factor? For, it would appear to me that the laws of thermodynamics do not cover this instance since they are only intended to cover whenever energy is conserved; not when it is not conserved?

It seems to me that the following popular expression is an understatement. It is this...

“Energy IN has to equal energy OUT”. That's nice, but fails to admit another option – the sort of statements which free energy enthusiasts like to make in response to being asked, “From where does the free energy in your device come from?” Or, “...disappear into?” Their response may take the form of: “From no where” versus “To no where”, respectively.

These explain merely half the issue at stake since they ignore the other major factor in physical existence which, rephrasing their responses, might sound like...

“Free energy came from, or disappears into, some when”.Or, do they?

They seem to overlook this option (for A/C waves) despite the Conservation of Energy managing to uphold this condition since nothing happened to alter the status of the two parent waves (of zero power factor) who spawned this mathematical fiction. The parent waves still exist. Yet, the daughter wave (of negative power factor) could endlessly supply unlimited amp-hours if isolated onto one side of a D/C to A/C inverter since it cannot dissipate, ie. alter, its condition. So long as it continues to be stimulated to exist from a source – subject to loss and conversion, but – vastly smaller than itself, so long will it continue to serve as a voltage source incapable of depletion since current – under these circumstances – wants to flow in reverse direction to conventional current. That is...

It wants to flow from areas of no voltage towards areas of higher voltage – “up the voltage-gradient creek” of increased resistance (since higher voltage almost always suggests a higher resistance is also present).

COMMENTS...

Your question/posting is EXTREMELY broad. It would probably take a whole book to adequately answer all of your questions and concerns. – David White 9 hours ago

"'Energy IN has to equal energy OUT'. That's nice, but fails to admit another option" - there is no other option. Conservation of energy is a thing. – 7 hours ago

I don't think the Laws of Thermodynamics cover a motor lagging the applied AC... – Solar Mike 5 hours ago

Solar Mike - The motor does not lag since it is not an A/C motor. It is either rectified, with a full bridge rectifier, to feed a D/C motor, or else hydraulically rectified using a bladeless turbine and a valvular conduit. – Vinyasien.wikipedia.org/wiki/… – Vinyasi 34 mins ago

David White - Yes. It is broad if not also thorough. Yet, simply stated in paragraphs 2 and 6. Everything else is supportive material. – Vinyasi 31 mins ago

OMG! A standing wave is an isolated condition! The 2nd law of thermodynamics holds for negative power factor. "The second law of thermodynamics states that the total entropy of an isolated system can never decrease over time." Voila! (A friend helped me to perform a better search!) - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_law_of_thermodynamics - Thanks, goes to all of you for commenting. And thanks goes to my friend. – Vinyasi 22 mins ago {Comment...This, I realized while re-asking this question on Quora.}

This further implies that the 2nd law applies to the two zero power factored, parent waves of their negatively power factored, daughter wave (to which the 2nd law does not apply)? – Vinyasi 18 mins ago

So, electrical waves (within a system) can change their net status (over time) as to whether or not the 2nd law will apply or not? – Vinyasi 1 min ago

Unless the complex number field - to which zero power factors belong - is already an inherently, isolated condition despite its lack of standing waves? – Vinyasi 30 seconds ago

Thus, there are two significant qualifications of a negative power factor: one is that of a standing wave (which is inherently isolated by its nature), while the second is that it is not entropic due to the inherent nature of standing waves to self-exponentiate, ie. self-amplify via self-multiplication of their amplitude. – Vinyasi ten seconds ago

Synonymous with the stimulated emissions of L.A.S.E.R.'s -- "light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation" - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laser#Stimulated_emission - yielding a two for one increase of energy output versus its input? - https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/F...d_Emission.svg – Vinyasi just now

Please go to this question posed on physics stack exchange and cast your positive vote to prevent this question from becoming deleted if it should reach a -4 vote.

ARCHIVED...

here

here

and here

[Vinyasi]

Please, may I ask a question?

I've figured out how to orient the geometry of a motor-build in order to compensate for a lossless, negative unity, power factor.

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Ls3SJZd8SU&feature=youtu.be[/VIDEO]

https://electronics.stackexchange.com/q/445771/151041

https://is.gd/dWuw13

May oscillations approximate infinite Quality factor? - Electrical Engineering Stack Exchange

https://is.gd/VhyhZx

https://web.archive.org/web/20190629180951/https://electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/445771/may-oscillations-approximate-infinite-quality-factor

https://is.gd/t2lyho

and i'm giving my ebooks away for free...

https://www.scribd.com/document/414619681/Extending-the-Range-of-Electric-Vehicles-by-Maximizing-Their-Amp-Hours

https://www.scribd.com/document/414620928/A-Theoretical-Explanation-of-How-Free-Energy-Operates-in-Our-Universe

[boguslaw]

I wish I could understand this whole EE slang :-( My very simple investigations during last 20 years lead me to the conclusion that magnetic field is the source of energy and all its manifestations are work done. This magnetic field is so special that it can do work FREELY ONLY is special case, all other cases obey the 2 Law of thermodynamics.
So we have new source of unlimited energy - magnetic field .