Tweet
Originally posted by GMC
View Post
I am no physicist.
However to say Newton's 3rd law is wrong, based upon the mechanized machinery devices is in error. And plain wrong.
While the guy can make his machine go on in a perpetual state, it is HE that has to sit there and exert the initial energy and continue to exert the force lest his balances and counter balances cease to operate.
If he stops providing the initial inertia, his device will stop.
You are looking at Newton's law from the improper perspective. And is he.
While theorized, it has never been PROVEN, or demonstrated, the Newton's 3rd law is in error.
FOr every action, there is and MUST be an equal and opposite reaction.
IF this were not the case, you should be able to start your car, with a battery and gasoline, as we do now, yet have the engine then produce MORE energy than it needs, thus feeding itself so it will continue to run...or operate without gasoline needed other than to start.
But, much like the mechanical contractions, once the energy ceases to exist, thus the motion will stop.
THis is true in his machines and this is true with your car. Outta gas? You go no where.
Newton's 3rd Law can also be interpreted as: For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. THis means, from another view point, that there exists no possibility that any energy can produce MORE ENERGY than is required to sustain and produce continued energy.
Why cannot a computer hold more than 64K in memory base chips?
Even the metals balls that sit on desks that whack one another, sending the opposite ball in the opposite direction will eventually come to a stop.
A grandfather clock needs re-winding.
A wrist watch will one day need a new battery.
The sun consumes far more hydrogen than it releases heat.
This law is why all stars eventually die.
Until someone builds and successfully demonstrates an energy motion that can produce MORE energy than is required to keep it in motion, Newton's 3rd Law stands.
The evidence provided by a guy tapping a machine with his finger to keep it running does little to demonstrate the law is wrong or invalid.
Neat and fun to watch. But nonetheless, if you are in the crowd that says Newton was / is wrong, you are going on faith and not evidence.
As quantum mechanics has now at least theorized dark energy, as being far more prevalent than dark matter, it all adds up.
Energy is NOT ALL matter, yet the matter is dependent upon the energy. Without one, there will not be the other. This is the proper interpretation of Newton's 3rd Law.
Perhaps someone should be re-examining e=mc 2!
If dark mater does exists, Einstein was wrong. Not Newton.
Newton's Law is so true, it even works in the world of Kharma. What goes around, comes around.
THat is how true Newton's 3rd law is. It supercedes matter. It even works in the etherial.
But thanks for letting me blab!
However to say Newton's 3rd law is wrong, based upon the mechanized machinery devices is in error. And plain wrong.
While the guy can make his machine go on in a perpetual state, it is HE that has to sit there and exert the initial energy and continue to exert the force lest his balances and counter balances cease to operate.
If he stops providing the initial inertia, his device will stop.
You are looking at Newton's law from the improper perspective. And is he.
While theorized, it has never been PROVEN, or demonstrated, the Newton's 3rd law is in error.
FOr every action, there is and MUST be an equal and opposite reaction.
IF this were not the case, you should be able to start your car, with a battery and gasoline, as we do now, yet have the engine then produce MORE energy than it needs, thus feeding itself so it will continue to run...or operate without gasoline needed other than to start.
But, much like the mechanical contractions, once the energy ceases to exist, thus the motion will stop.
THis is true in his machines and this is true with your car. Outta gas? You go no where.
Newton's 3rd Law can also be interpreted as: For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. THis means, from another view point, that there exists no possibility that any energy can produce MORE ENERGY than is required to sustain and produce continued energy.
Why cannot a computer hold more than 64K in memory base chips?
Even the metals balls that sit on desks that whack one another, sending the opposite ball in the opposite direction will eventually come to a stop.
A grandfather clock needs re-winding.
A wrist watch will one day need a new battery.
The sun consumes far more hydrogen than it releases heat.
This law is why all stars eventually die.
Until someone builds and successfully demonstrates an energy motion that can produce MORE energy than is required to keep it in motion, Newton's 3rd Law stands.
The evidence provided by a guy tapping a machine with his finger to keep it running does little to demonstrate the law is wrong or invalid.
Neat and fun to watch. But nonetheless, if you are in the crowd that says Newton was / is wrong, you are going on faith and not evidence.
As quantum mechanics has now at least theorized dark energy, as being far more prevalent than dark matter, it all adds up.
Energy is NOT ALL matter, yet the matter is dependent upon the energy. Without one, there will not be the other. This is the proper interpretation of Newton's 3rd Law.
Perhaps someone should be re-examining e=mc 2!
If dark mater does exists, Einstein was wrong. Not Newton.
Newton's Law is so true, it even works in the world of Kharma. What goes around, comes around.
THat is how true Newton's 3rd law is. It supercedes matter. It even works in the etherial.
But thanks for letting me blab!
Comment