Tweet
As we all know, efforts to bring about a thorough, impartial, and totally transparent official scientific reinvestigation into the several 9-11 events which do not stand up to scrutinization of the "official" explanations of those events, has so far been impossible to achieve. That's not to say that no credible investigations have been carried out, though. Several of the 9-11 Truth groups have examined these events within the scope of their individual expertise,and each has concluded that the "official" narrative was false. Several of those studies have been featured in this thread. A new study being conducted at the University of Alaska, Fairbanks, will use extensive computer modeling techniques to explore all possible reasons why WTC building 7 could have collapsed, and collapsed the way it did - at nearly free fall speed. This will be a two year study, and it will be 100% transparent. Experts in the fields of Architecture, Engineering, Structural Fire, Physics, Demolition, and other related sciences, have been invited to openly participate in the study, as well as the public.
There are many who believe that WTC Building 7 is the "smoking gun" which proves that the 9-11 events were a coordinated inside job. The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), a US government division of the Department of Commerce, was the agency tasked with producing an "official" report regarding the collapse of WTC buildings, including Building 7. NIST concluded that Building 7's collapse was caused by fires, and yet photos and video of the building prior to, and during, the collapse show that there were very few fires and that those fires were minimal in nature. Furthermore, no steel structure building had ever collapsed due to fire prior to 9-11-2001. Unlike the twin towers, of course, Building 7 was never alleged to have been struck by a plane. While NIST came up with a theory to explain the collapse, they admitted that they really couldn't explain why the building collapsed at near free fall speed. They also said that they never investigated the possibility of a pre-planned demolition, since there was no credible evidence suggesting that was the case. During a video recorded presentation by a NIST spokesman, a member of the audience asked if NIST could explain the remnants of thermite found in WTC dust, or the molten steel found at the base of the twin towers and building 7. The presenter smirked, as if to indicate that any such reports were ridiculous, and disavowed that NIST had seen or heard any credible knowlege of such factors. As this video footage shows, however, those claims were nothing but blatant lies, and that alone should have been sufficient reason to toss out the NIST report as unreliable. Of course NIST, being a government agency, had to come up with an explanation which supported the "official" story, no matter how unbelievable that story was. If a truly independent, scientifically conducted study into the collapse of building 7 confirms that it could only have collapsed as the result of pre-planned demolition, then of course this would show that there was foreknowledge and collusion by the insiders who planned and carried out the deception while blaming it on others as a false flag event.
There are many who believe that WTC Building 7 is the "smoking gun" which proves that the 9-11 events were a coordinated inside job. The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), a US government division of the Department of Commerce, was the agency tasked with producing an "official" report regarding the collapse of WTC buildings, including Building 7. NIST concluded that Building 7's collapse was caused by fires, and yet photos and video of the building prior to, and during, the collapse show that there were very few fires and that those fires were minimal in nature. Furthermore, no steel structure building had ever collapsed due to fire prior to 9-11-2001. Unlike the twin towers, of course, Building 7 was never alleged to have been struck by a plane. While NIST came up with a theory to explain the collapse, they admitted that they really couldn't explain why the building collapsed at near free fall speed. They also said that they never investigated the possibility of a pre-planned demolition, since there was no credible evidence suggesting that was the case. During a video recorded presentation by a NIST spokesman, a member of the audience asked if NIST could explain the remnants of thermite found in WTC dust, or the molten steel found at the base of the twin towers and building 7. The presenter smirked, as if to indicate that any such reports were ridiculous, and disavowed that NIST had seen or heard any credible knowlege of such factors. As this video footage shows, however, those claims were nothing but blatant lies, and that alone should have been sufficient reason to toss out the NIST report as unreliable. Of course NIST, being a government agency, had to come up with an explanation which supported the "official" story, no matter how unbelievable that story was. If a truly independent, scientifically conducted study into the collapse of building 7 confirms that it could only have collapsed as the result of pre-planned demolition, then of course this would show that there was foreknowledge and collusion by the insiders who planned and carried out the deception while blaming it on others as a false flag event.
Comment