Seriously .... has anyone been successful?

[seth]

Seth, that is only free energy if the food you eat was free. Just kidding. but that would be a handy pesonal light if the ground rod could be somehow replaced or a good static light if the human was replaced. I wonder would it work with a potted plant instead of the person. I have to try not to be so interested in everything i read, now I have to try that too.

I was thinking of trying to develop a garden light that just works 24/7 by pushing it into the ground, using ground and maybe air charges. What you posted seth could be a head start in that direction.

Cheers

All good ideas! I noticed that this effect seemed to increase on my second floor - im hoping adding a little height may get the diode up to super bright. I'm already moving to a flat in a few weeks, so ill have ample chance to test height - air charges get better up there i assume.

I wondered if as a ground connection some sort of coil or earth battery arrangement might enhance the output also.

In regards to the personal torch, how about aluminium foil on your trainers and a wire up your leg?

Anyway, im happy with this AV plug - its putting out endless tiny amounts of energy, and i need very very little.......just got to get the output a bit more lairy.

[david lambright]

hi everyone...

as far as making a device that put out a constant flow of energy, with only a small initial charge to energize it, i HAVE done just that...there is a visible radiant energy flowing from my device that looks like a mirage.....for this energy to be visible, there must be an oscillation for a wave to develop...so there is an energy coming off my devices.....perpetual in its nature but not coming from nothing....simillar to an electrostatic field....my device seperates the charge and that is why it is visible in an optical wavelength....here is a post from another forum...--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hi fan1701, this is really cool stuff! Just for the-hal-la-butt, I set the wheel over a magnetron, and sat watching the waves go upward! There was no doubt in my mind that I was watching something taking place!!

I'm still trying to get a meeting with an instructor in the photography dept. where I go to school. I'm going to see if he/she would be interested in using their knowledge to capture on video what is taking place. Possibly making it a class project would help David out immensely by keeping it open source. I will post the video here on [forum name] should one of the instructors agree to do it.

Below I'm just showing the wheel with the magnetron. I don't believe there's any way to capture the waves with a cell phone.END
anyway there is a constant flow of energy coming from my devices...david

[Aromaz]

. . . Edwin Gray, Stanley Meyer and Dr. Andrija Puharich . . .

No electronics, only rotors and coils.
On the Testatika I believe location is a big part of the key; same as with Tesla experiments. Underground limestone formations with cavities and running water. It is wrongly stated that lightning never stikes twice at the same place.

Yes, if we truely understand the mechanism of lightning we will get very far.
Yes, the energy we seek to tap must be in the tension - the field. Air / vacuum / aether!

[Farmhand]

Yes, if we truely understand the mechanism of lightning we will get very far.
Yes, the energy we seek to tap must be in the tension - the field. Air / vacuum / aether!

Aromaz I am seriously considering erecting a lightning rod in a safe area here, so I can more reliably observe the strikes and results I only have a cheap video camera and mid range DSLR camera. I live on the very top of one of the upper ridges of a very large mountain thats only 270 meters or so above sea level.

The lightning season is about to start so maybe next year, it will require planning to make it safe. Lightning strikes very close all around during most storms and I have one tree only 30-40 meters from my bunkhouse that was struck and I see that about 1 meter above the ground the lightning exited the tree and arced to the ground the tree above the exit hole is dead below is alive and producing new shoots for my goats which is good for them.
I have seen this actually happen to other tree's I havn't fully decided the cause but it appears the tree offers more resistance at it's base maybe because of less water content or hollow there. Would the tree rectify the energy in the bolt somehow someway ?

Anyway my point is if I build a lightning rod in the right place and can get lightning to stike it safely. I have a huge radiant shockwave device to study.

I would then set up various circuits or arrangements around it at a safe distance to see what is happening. I was also thinking of a spark gap of maybe 1 foot wide about 3 feet from the ground incorperated into the rods design so as to have a second arc. I am a metal fabricator/ boilermaker so actually building and erecting it won't be a problem for me, getting the correct materials together may be more difficult.

Cheers

[Aromaz]

Aromaz I am seriously considering erecting a lightning rod in a safe area here

Very interesting indeed. I would like to ask just a few questions that might be helping you to get higher concentration of lighting.

1) What is the soil type? Soil depth?
2) What kind of rock-bed do you have under the topsoil?
3) How deep is water table?
4) Both where you intend to put the antenna and where the struck trees are.
5) How far are you from the sea / salty water?
6) Any underground rivers or surface streams passing under/near this location?

I will explain later, based on this answers.

[Farmhand]

O.K.

Soil is a fine dark soil only 1' deep or less at ridge top in places, some more up to 3 or 4 '.

There is a lot of granite under the topsoil and rocks big ones some granite, some are a very hard different kind of rock.

No idea about the water table but there is a dam and creek at the bottom of the ridge about 40 meters below ridgetop. I think where the tree I was talking about was struck the water table would be closer about 10 20 meters I guess.

I am about 35 klm from the sea as the crow flies.

When it rains I think there is underground water flows under the ridgetop but I don't really know, but I do know that there is a small underground stream when it's raining a lot from the rain that is trapped in a rock formation and soaks into ground on the ridgetop, it flows down past where the tree I was talking about was struck. I should take a photo of the tree and its exit wound tommorrow.

Hope that covers it.

Cheers

[bolt1]

Trees are very good antennas especially from ELF through short wave to about 20 Mhz. if you put a wire in the tree via a screw or nail and bang it in about 4 inches about 20ft up you get about 2 volts from it.

If you connect to SW radio it picks up stuff really well and you can transmit through a tree too. This makes no sense to some people that think the tree is wet and will short out the signals. You be surprised you don't have to adjust the VSWR too much!

FOr high gain you make a co phased array of trees in a triangle pick about 3 equal size set about 50 ft appart then mix the trees signal through a ferrite ring as a mixer.

BUT also if you make a tree resonate by "pinging it" then capture the BEMF off it it will return a very good signal a bit like coil banging I haven't tried it but i think its enough to charge a car battery.

[shawnnweed]

I have acheived 67%. Uisng 1000 milliamps input to an LED I acheived a 670 milliamp output from the solar cells. In the space of a few months I went from 10% to 67% and the next step will be to achieve overunity or +1 if that is what you want to call it. I fully understand the laws of physics and why they say it is not possible. And I agree that the manner in which they are trying to achieve it is not possible; through increased effeicincies. Yet I have been succesful because I am not trying to beat a dead horse. I went an altogether different route and not only achieved a huge jump in productivity/ ouput but understand mathematically how to achieve overunity/and can prove it. HoweverI really do not beleive anyone up to this point has acheived overunity. But it's not far away. [email protected]

[Cherryman]

I have acheived 67%. Uisng 1000 milliamps input to an LED I acheived a 670 milliamp output from the solar cells. In the space of a few months I went from 10% to 67% and the next step will be to achieve overunity or +1 if that is what you want to call it. I fully understand the laws of physics and why they say it is not possible. And I agree that the manner in which they are trying to achieve it is not possible; through increased effeicincies. Yet I have been succesful because I am not trying to beat a dead horse. I went an altogether different route and not only achieved a huge jump in productivity/ ouput but understand mathematically how to achieve overunity/and can prove it. HoweverI really do not beleive anyone up to this point has acheived overunity. But it's not far away. [email protected]

Sounds good! Are you open sourcing it or is it a private project?

If you have a working 67% solar cell configuration right now, you have the most efficient one I'm aware of exists.

Any more info about it?

[david lambright]

but what is it?

as far as making a device that put out a constant flow of energy, with only a small initial charge to energize it, i HAVE done just that...there is a visible radiant energy flowing from my device that looks like a mirage.....for this energy to be visible, there must be an oscillation for a wave to develop...so there is an energy coming off my devices.....perpetual in its nature but not coming from nothing....simillar to an electrostatic field....my device seperates the charge and that is why it is visible in an optical wavelength....here is a post from another forum...--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hi fan1701, this is really cool stuff! Just for the-hal-la-butt, I set the wheel over a magnetron, and sat watching the waves go upward! There was no doubt in my mind that I was watching something taking place!!

I'm still trying to get a meeting with an instructor in the photography dept. where I go to school. I'm going to see if he/she would be interested in using their knowledge to capture on video what is taking place. Possibly making it a class project would help David out immensely by keeping it open source. I will post the video here on [forum name] should one of the instructors agree to do it.

Below I'm just showing the wheel with the magnetron. I don't believe there's any way to capture the waves with a cell phone.END
anyway there is a constant flow of energy coming from my devices...david

sorry about that, my device makes something, not fully understood by me, but not the OU in this thread, anyway, sorry, david

[goldsphere]

We all are!

Don't believe anyone, we all run our homes "off the grid".
Overunity is the standard not the exception. This whole forum mainframe is
run off a zpe device of unknown construction because it is totally sealed, the reason being that it needs to be under a partial vacuum to run.
I say all this to keep the belief system pulsating. i have gone from two extremes in forums and finally after many years landed here.
This is not about who has created an OU device, but when we have created it. We all have either in past or future.
Let not dark see my light and high desires.

[phi1.62]

John Moray, the son of Thomas Moray, was taught by his father all of the secrets regarding his tubes and energy receivers. In the 1970's, he assisted the navy in conducting experiments regarding the technology. John Moray states that it would cost several million dollars to bring the tecnology to a commerically viable state.

[jonnydavro]

I have acheived 67%. Uisng 1000 milliamps input to an LED I acheived a 670 milliamp output from the solar cells. In the space of a few months I went from 10% to 67% and the next step will be to achieve overunity or +1 if that is what you want to call it. I fully understand the laws of physics and why they say it is not possible. And I agree that the manner in which they are trying to achieve it is not possible; through increased effeicincies. Yet I have been succesful because I am not trying to beat a dead horse. I went an altogether different route and not only achieved a huge jump in productivity/ ouput but understand mathematically how to achieve overunity/and can prove it. HoweverI really do not beleive anyone up to this point has acheived overunity. But it's not far away. [email protected]

Hi shawnnweed.Any chance of posting more details of what you are doing?
If you are using Leds to iluminate a solar panal and getting a 67% energy recovery then this would help us out immensely with our experiments with exciter circuits,it may even allow us to loop it as hundreds of Leds can be lit very economically with the slayer exciter.Any details you can share with us would be warmly welcomed.
You can see the type of circuits we are using here.Many thanks.Jonny.

http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/showthread.php?t=4999

[shawnnweed]

i did

I contributed with all the knowledge i acquired reading and working very hard on experiments to try to create a collaborative knowledge for everyone here...
and i keep working not for money, for the entire humanity.

Then why won't you share your free energy? where it come from? wind solar?

By free energy i meant overunity! sorry...

The attack is directed to those who have and hide it and those who lie saying that had it and didn't fight for it..

not you probably!

So don't take it personal.. . Those who should take it personal hopefully will!

Regards

I posted my idea for an over-unity device, explained it fairly well i thought but only received negative responses. I will be attempting to build it next month. If you care to see the idea it's posted under "The challenge...perpetual energy. You can pull it up just as quick by searching out my name.
,Shawn

[shawnnweed]

Hi shawnnweed.Any chance of posting more details of what you are doing?
If you are using Leds to iluminate a solar panal and getting a 67% energy recovery then this would help us out immensely with our experiments with exciter circuits,it may even allow us to loop it as hundreds of Leds can be lit very economically with the slayer exciter.Any details you can share with us would be warmly welcomed.
You can see the type of circuits we are using here.Many thanks.Jonny.
http://www.energeticforum.com/renewa...ead.php?t=4999

The led's have not been released yet. However, there are two companies that will release them soon and even offer samples right now. Everlight Led, products, high power LED's, HV(1W,2W,4W). Also there is another company going down the same path as this one. Epistar LED. Due to the High voltage the amperage drops dramatically. If you put two of these in series you could run them from 400 volts and 10 milliamperes. In essance you could easily make an over-unity device this way. It's simple math. At 400 volts and 30 mA you can create 1,400 lumen of light. 1000 lumen is all that is required to cause 12 monocrystalline solar cell, operating at 15%, to create 40ma. 30ma creates 40 ma. And it only goes up from there. Add enough LEd's and you could create huge amounts of energy. But no one is listening to me because I do not possess a PhD. Anyway if you would like to check out the whole idea just search out the forum called "The Challenge...perpetual energy" of type in my name.