This forum is preserved as a permanent archive. The community continues at eMedia Press.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

car cell questions

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • car cell questions

    Hi everybody my name is Aaron. I'm new to this forum and have enjoyed very much reading your discussions on water fuel technology. I have a few questions to pose.

    1:Why has no-one ever preheated the cell water with the engine on vehicle mounted cells?I have a Toyota 4runner that gets terrible had mileage and want tho build a cell.

    2:If steam is non conductive therefore no good for high temperature electrolysis why not do it with super heated water?

    3: there is discussions on Stanley Meyers tech as the key being premixing h2 with atmosphere before burning isn't that what everyone with a car cell already does what is different about how Stanley did it? Thank you for your time and opinion.

  • #2
    Originally posted by Wolverine View Post
    Hi everybody my name is Aaron. I'm new to this forum and have enjoyed very much reading your discussions on water fuel technology. I have a few questions to pose.

    1:Why has no-one ever preheated the cell water with the engine on vehicle mounted cells?I have a Toyota 4runner that gets terrible had mileage and want tho build a cell.

    2:If steam is non conductive therefore no good for high temperature electrolysis why not do it with super heated water?

    3: there is discussions on Stanley Meyers tech as the key being premixing h2 with atmosphere before burning isn't that what everyone with a car cell already does what is different about how Stanley did it? Thank you for your time and opinion.
    http://www.energeticforum.com/water-...ley-meyer.html
    Last edited by tutanka; 09-17-2013, 07:17 AM.

    Comment


    • #3
      what catalyst?
      Last edited by tachyon; 09-17-2013, 01:20 PM.
      The pure in heart will see the light.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by tachyon View Post
        what catalyst?
        An catalyst that remove oxygen.. there are more ..

        Comment


        • #5
          what's the balanced equation for this?
          Last edited by tachyon; 09-17-2013, 04:06 PM.
          The pure in heart will see the light.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by tachyon View Post
            what's the balanced equation for this?

            I can reassume into:

            C+CO2=2CO

            C+H2O=CO+H2

            Comment


            • #7
              Thank you, you have given me some food for thought with the theory of being able to crack water/air with catalyst metals and vacuum conditions to lower the activation level. For instance guys experimenting with water spark plug plasma devices are going about it in a brute force method that is inefficient. If they ignited water or steam near BDC rather than near TDC of the piston there would be a vacuum condition in the cylinder then take a nickel plated spark plug ignite during intake vacuum stroke hydrogen will burn and the cylinder will rapidly cool sucking the piston up like a flame licker motor. If you have ever watched the videos of Joe brooks inventor of the Joe cell he talks about this affect and I never got how it worked til just now. Think about it you would have everything you need to create the reaction a low pressure vacuum from intake stroke, plasma and metal catalyst from the spark plug. The gas would be generated and ignited the cylinder would rapidly cool sucking the piston up to TDC so a vacuum power stroke instead of a explosive power stroke.
              Last edited by Wolverine; 09-18-2013, 07:04 AM. Reason: more thoughts

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Wolverine View Post
                Thank you, you have given me some food for thought with the theory of being able to crack water/air with catalyst metals and vacuum conditions to lower the activation level. For instance guys experimenting with water spark plug plasma devices are going about it in a brute force method that is inefficient. If they ignited water or steam near BDC rather than near TDC of the piston there would be a vacuum condition in the cylinder then take a nickel plated spark plug ignite during intake vacuum stroke hydrogen will burn and the cylinder will rapidly cool sucking the piston up like a flame licker motor. If you have ever watched the videos of Joe brooks inventor of the Joe cell he talks about this affect and I never got how it worked til just now. Think about it you would have everything you need to create the reaction a low pressure vacuum from intake stroke, plasma and metal catalyst from the spark plug. The gas would be generated and ignited the cylinder would rapidly cool sucking the piston up to TDC so a vacuum power stroke instead of a explosive power stroke.
                My personal suggestion is build an external reactor for make gas, in the engine phases you don't have more time for obtain the properly reaction

                Comment


                • #9
                  Ok, I guess then the way to go about it would be to have a throttle body kind of like a basic carburetor only with water instead of gas and have electrodes inside to crack the steam in the venturi vacuum of the carburetor. I know the Geet design generates the plasma for free without electrodes but I don't care for how drastically the exhaust system has to be modified or how critical the length of the reactor and rod are in that design. Circuit tuned electrodes can be tuned in amp,volts,and frequency to produce the proper effect much easier than altering the exhaust system.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Wolverine View Post
                    Ok, I guess then the way to go about it would be to have a throttle body kind of like a basic carburetor only with water instead of gas and have electrodes inside to crack the steam in the venturi vacuum of the carburetor. I know the Geet design generates the plasma for free without electrodes but I don't care for how drastically the exhaust system has to be modified or how critical the length of the reactor and rod are in that design. Circuit tuned electrodes can be tuned in amp,volts,and frequency to produce the proper effect much easier than altering the exhaust system.
                    You can make also smaller reactor , the important is the formation of the heat inside. You can use catalyst for or other technology , that don't use electricity, for plasma creation inside. But at the end what you process is the CO2/H2O and you don't make an mini-refinery as Naudin ask on PMC web site page.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Tutank can be used coper Tubes - a rod of iron and nickel - Heated spiral. I would use kompressor - the negative pressure combustion gases through the bubbler and the oil back into the burner Foreclosure

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        So basically however you go about it whether it be plasma, hilsch Rankin effect, catalyst metals like iron and nickel, or some combination thereof to produce the necessary temperature in the presence of water and co2 more or less atmospheric air itself a fuel is synthesized?

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Wolverine View Post
                          So basically however you go about it whether it be plasma, hilsch Rankin effect, catalyst metals like iron and nickel, or some combination thereof to produce the necessary temperature in the presence of water and co2 more or less atmospheric air itself a fuel is synthesized?
                          Simply .. the water is the fuel, oil is the starter of process and the CO2 is the carbon source.. air just the oxygen source for burn oil.
                          Last edited by tutanka; 09-21-2013, 04:19 PM.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            seriously what catalyst are you using?
                            The pure in heart will see the light.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by tachyon View Post
                              seriously what catalyst are you using?
                              Simply iron but you can use all catalysts that absorbs oxygen

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X