Garry Stanley Pulse Motor

[Gabor]

Gyula, Are you from Hungary?
Thanks,
Gabor

[Arthurs]

And window motor comparison: Who is a greater torque?

Very much like to know: when the input voltage and current the same, compared with Bedini Window Motor, which is greater torque?

[SkyWatcher]

Hi arthurs, the window motor may have added benefits, as far as collapsing field not being impeded as much as typical solenoid coil designs and its interaction with magnet rotor.
Though, as I found with the dual rotor Garry type motor, as you add more coils in series and add voltage and add more magnet rotors, more and more shaft power can be had for the same input.
Or it could be a combination of series parallel coils to keep voltage to a reasonable level.
Imagine at least 12 sets of dual magnet rotors and say around 200 volt input or more and this motor would be very powerful and efficient.
The added rotor mass, magnets and copper, coupled with higher voltage and lower input amps, creates high efficiency and power, very similar to Joseph Newman's principles.
Peace love light
Tyson

[wrtner]

I am new to this thread and hope you don't find this question too stupid.

Am I right that Garry's basic concepts can be seen as either a generator or a motor? If so, can both elements be built into one replication?

[gyula]

...
Am I right that Garry's basic concepts can be seen as either a generator or a motor? If so, can both elements be built into one replication?

Hi wrtner,

Basically, Garry Stanley's concept is valid for motor mode as per my understanding, Garry designed it for motors. If it is used for generators, then Lenz law is at full strength. In fact there is Lenz law in motor mode too but in this case Lenz effect occurs during only the time the paralleled coils are ON to pull in the approaching rotor magnet pairs to their center line (TDC), then coils are OFF and the magnets can freely leave the coil area without drag (there are no ferromagnetic cores in the coils).

Gyula

[Arthurs]

Hi SkyWatcher:
Very interested in your copy of Garry Stanley Pulse Motor, and I plan to copy. Because English is not my native language, is not well understood contents of the forum, hope to get your help.

Can the detailed production information sent to my e-mail: [email protected], the way I want to use pictures Nengkanmingbai, including circuit diagrams, charts and magnet arrangement, the most important is the arrangement of the coils.
Thank you very much!

[SkyWatcher]

Hi arthurs, i did make somewhat of a copy, then just stuck to single separate air coils and wired them in series and or series parallel.
As i mentioned, as you add more magnet rotors and more coils in series or series/parallel and then up the voltage to maintain desired rpm, the motor will continue to output more and more shaft power and use the same input as one stator plate/ dual magnet rotor configuration.
Garry mentioned that his motor was able to move his heavy bike at a certain speed, using 100 watts.
Where as, it took a 200 watt off the shelf motor to move the bike at the same speed and even then, it was still lacking in torque to move through hilly bumps in the road.
If any information you need, is not already in this thread, let me know, i will try to answer any questions.
peace love light

[hanon1492]

Garry Stanley was using two bucking coils

http://youtu.be/Z-V1z2TdQJA

You should read more info about bucking coils in hyiq.org - Home of Floyd Sweet VTA Replication Project

http://www.hyiq.org/Downloads/Guidel...ng%20Coils.pdf

Regards

[Bob Smith]

Garry Stanley was using two bucking coils

http://youtu.be/Z-V1z2TdQJA

You should read more info about bucking coils in hyiq.org - Home of Floyd Sweet VTA Replication Project

http://www.hyiq.org/Downloads/Guidel...ng%20Coils.pdf

Regards

Thanks for posting these, Hanon. Very helpful!
Happy New Year to you!
Bob

[SkyWatcher]

Hi folks, Hi hanon, thanks for sharing this information.
Yes, that is what garry was saying, wind each partner coil in the opposite direction and he even had a space in between the 2 coils, the clear plastic.
Only difference i can tell, is that garry had them wired in parallel.
Wait, i don't think garry actually wound his coils in opposite direction, because they were coils salvaged from floppy drives.

It's funny you posted this at this time, because i was just about to start winding a new 4 ferrite bead inverter for powering led bulbs or gutted cfl's.
So, i'm trying this configuration.
Just wound 2 separate 30awg. coils in opposite winding direction with a space between the coils on the ferrite bead core.
Will then wind a bifilar self oscillator on top of that, 24awg. and see what happens.
If any odd results are seen, i will share.
peace love light

[SkyWatcher]

Hi folks, finished winding the coils.
Just a quick observation, until i hook up the bifilar oscillator that is wound on only one half of the ferrite bead or over only one of the partnered opposite wound coils.
Using the 2 lithium ion in series and a neo magnet to check for magnetic field poles on coil/core, it seems the same magnetic poles are at each end of the ferrite core.
And at the same time, in the center of the core, where i left a 1/4" space, there is a proper north and south magnetic pole.
This is observed because the neo magnet pulls to one coil and the other repels.
Normally, if two coils are partnered in such a fashion as to create the same magnetic pole at each end of the core, we would have a cancellation field in the center, or two like poles at the center.
I think i see why sykes speaks about maintaining electric polarity integrity.
I should have given this more thought in the past.
Edit: just realized the poles are the same at the center.
Will be testing.



peace love light

[hanon1492]

Garry Stanley was using two bucking coils

http://youtu.be/Z-V1z2TdQJA

You should read more info about bucking coils in hyiq.org - Home of Floyd Sweet VTA Replication Project

http://www.hyiq.org/Downloads/Guidel...ng%20Coils.pdf

Regards

These are two very good videos to grasp this idea. Please watch them!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rcks2fcpHUk

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PTykNjDD0CM

This second video is just to get the idea. I think with this wiring the resulting voltage will be null but think with one coil CW and the other CCW with an intermediate wiring connection to extract the induced voltage.

I hope to be helpful

[SkyWatcher]

Hi hanon, i fired up the oscillator and wired the two partnered coils in parallel in two different ways.
First way, one connection at center and a connected the ends, this gave good light in a non-modified 6 watt led bulb, 3.5v-.5 amp input.
Second way, end of one coil connected to center of other coil, etc., this way gave similar brightness, though drew .59 amps input.
Thinking of winding another bifilar over the opposite partnered output coil and wire it into the other bifilar coil, for one large oscillator.
Have to think if any of this is any benefit so far.
peace love light

[SkyWatcher]

Hi folks, just want to share these results so far.
After making many different tests with this setup.
I have found that when the partnered coil wire ends, at the center, are connected and the outside wire ends connected, for a parallel wiring configuration, a reduction of input occurs when loaded with the 6 watt non-modified led bulb.
Unloaded self oscillator input is 3.5 volts @ .7 amps or 2.45 watts.
When partnered secondary coils are loaded with led bulb, input is .52 amps or 1.82 watts, with nice light output.
With a 220 nanofarad non-polarized capacitor is shunted directly across secondary coil output, input is then .4 amps or 1.4 watts.
Seems interesting.
peace love light

[garrys]

close but no prizes

Garry Stanley was using two bucking coils

How "Partnered Output Coils" Work Together - Its NOW up to YOU!!! - YouTube

You should read more info about bucking coils in hyiq.org - Home of Floyd Sweet VTA Replication Project

http://www.hyiq.org/Downloads/Guidel...ng%20Coils.pdf

Regards

I have to say that over the years I have seen many people apply their understanding of what I did and tell everyone this is how its done.
some even showed how it couldn't possibly be done.
hannon is close and is in fact using a version of what I did for whatever but in his demonstration the difference is I powered my coils + to the 2 outer ends and - to the center.
Using this wiring it is the generated voltage from the magnets passing that is countered as the induced flow generated in the coils is opposite in each coil and both coils being equal it sums to 0, this is what takes away the lenz effect but more importantly it reduces the generator output and from the same voltage supply the motor can now go much faster before the internally generated voltage + losses equals the input voltage and stops the inward flow of electrons.

When someone tells you "it cant be done" what they are really saying is "I cant do it" ...this doesn't mean you cant do it ...it just means no one has done it yet.

Thanx

Garry