Uncovering the Missing Secrets of Magnetism. 92 pages. Free new book

[TheoriaApophasis]

Based upon 10 years of research and finding a few of the last remaining LINKS in the puzzle from Eric P Dollard,

I will be done in less than a week.

When I upload the 92+ PAGE article (with many original diagrams) to the website,


*EDIT, DONE.

Done, BOOK uploaded, 110 pages


2 sizes, small and large (one reduced in image optimization)


www.kathodos.com/magnetism1.pdf 67.9 MB PDF

www.kathodos.com/magnetismsmall.pdf 13.4 MB PDF


Page 30 begins the description of magnetism.


Yes, there is much repetition at times, but this full work is meant as a prequel to a 250+ page book.


Enjoy

I will give everyone here a link to the book, IT IS FREE

Uncovering the Missing Secrets of Magnetism

Exploring the nature of Magnetism, with regards to the true model of atomic geometry and field mechanics by means of rational physics & logic

ISBN 0-9712541-8-4





I have been killing myself to finish the work, all the original diagrams, and digital validations, and experiments with pyrol. graphite, and my own special creation of ferrofluid, and checking and rechecking.


Owning every book ever published on earth on Magnetism and having 100% FREE time for the past 14 years, and having a lifetime devotion to uncovering magnetism, ....


I dont say casually that I am certain you will be stunned with the results / information.


Hope you enjoy it.

[Bob Smith]

Thanks for the update Ken. Very much looking forward to it.
Bob

[TheoriaApophasis]

Thanks for the update Ken. Very much looking forward to it.
Bob

Thanks, .....Ive been upset for 20+ years owning every book ever made about magnets and magnetism, ...they are all literally trash.

nonsensical reifications , either atomistic, or illogical twaddle on par with new-age tinfoil hat crypto-mysticism and then there is the Cult of Quantum's position.

Feynmans "virtual photon" twaddle. GR and QM shudder when the word FIELD is mentioned.

GR and QM are no different than ancient Greek Atomism actually.


unfortunately...... "modern humanity has replaced one kind of magic for another kind, more convoluted but the same frequency of crazy" - Jennings.


The term magnet itself is the ROOT of the term magic.

This history of magnetism is the very likely to be sure the origin of the premise of ‘magic’ itself; these histories of magic, based on the Hermetic tradition, suggest that knowledge of the magnet originated with the Magi, plural of magh, or magus, who were the first to discover its attraction for loadstone iron. Consequently, the “magical” loadstones were named in their honor. The word magnet deriving from the Sanskrit root word, mahaji, meaning the great or wise, but specifically meaning “has magic” (in ancient days wisdom was magic and vice versa). The Egyptians believed the sky to be made of iron or steel, namely obviously due to iron meteorites; hence the name for iron, metal of heaven. Meteoritic iron, which is, early on, famous from loadstones with their “magical attraction”.

“Why the Heraclean stone attracts iron. Empedocles says that the iron is borne towards the stone by the effluvia emanating from both and because the pores of the stone are fitted to receive the effluvium of the iron. The effluvium of the stone then expels the air from the pores of the iron. Once the air is expelled, the iron itself is carried along by the abundant flow of the effluvium. Again, when the effluvium of the iron moves towards the pores of the stone, which are fitted to receive it, the iron begins to move with it.” - Empedocles of Akragas (491-435B.C.) (from the second hand account of Alexander of Aphrodisias who paraphrases Empedocles theory.)

As today, there are only two explanations for magnetism, one materialistic and mechanical (as above, evoking particles, nonsense), and the other immaterial, based in fields, the Ether (Platonic and Pythagorean in nature). This Atomistic / materialistic insanity contrasts with the Thalean theory, which attributes the attraction to a non-materialistic, hidden, and immaterial cause, or mediator. As was in ancient times so it is today, that these two views constitute the two main positions used to construct theories of electricity and magnetism throughout the “prescientific” and “scientific” (irrational) eras. All the theories constructed since the days of the ancients can be classified as either materialistic, based on the action of effluvia in the form of tiny insensible particles (same as the nonsense of GR and QM today), or as non-material fields, and forces of attraction that acts at a distance across the intervening space and vacuum.

Another ancient materialistic view of magnetism: “Democritus also says that there are effluences and that like bodies are attracted to like, but adds that all are attracted to a void. Having made these hypotheses, he supposes that the loadstone and iron consist of similar atoms, but those of stone are smaller and it is of some rarer texture than the iron and contains more void. For this reason, its atoms being more mobile are attracted more quickly to the iron (for they are moving to their similars), and entering the pores of the iron disturb the atoms in it as they pass between owing to their small size. The atoms of the iron, thus disturbed, stream outside towards the stone because of their similarity and because it has more void. The iron [as a whole] follows them in their wholesale expulsion and movement and is itself drawn towards the stone. the reason why the stone does not move any more towards the iron is that the iron does not contain so much void.” – Democritus (according to Alexander of Aphrodisias who is source on this subject)



That of course was just a touch of history, which in NO WAY explains magnetism, but an interesting look back........way back !

[Dingus]

Will the book include the history of magnetism?

[TheoriaApophasis]

Will the book include the history of magnetism?

This first edition is only a very tiny section on the history, less than a page.


You can get the HISTORY of magnetism anywhere,

The "how / why/ what" of what magnetism is, how it works..........that missing section (the only important section) is the only real point of focus.

Additionally included is a 4 page section on the missing geometry of light with rational, logical explanations

additionally a correction of the photoelectric effect and its fallacy in presuming the chain of causation from Xray / gamma charge from coincidental light on a charging vacuum plate.

bit of humor:-----

[LutherG]

Hello TheoriaApophasis,

Thank you for all the work you've done and for your kind gesture in sharing it with us! I can hardly wait to read what you've sorted out!

Best regards,

Luther

[Turion]

I too appreciate your willingness to share and your dedication to the research.

Dave

[ewizard]

Thank you for sharing this! It has always seemed a misty mystery surrounding what magnetism really is to me. Sure we know some of it's properties but what really explains it has seemed lacking.

Based on your research do you believe it is possible to build a device that can generate power with magnets (essentially free energy from magnetism) ?

[Stealth]

Good News

This is certainly exiting news. I once spent an entire year doing all sorts of experiments with magnets. I recorded all the experiments and fashioned them into a book. I learned more about magnetism that year than I would ever have learned reading books or searching the internet. The reason I did it was that the information I wanted was not on the internet or recorded in any book. I have several books that I bought and found they only contained general or sketchy information at best. My tests and experimental are not technical, in any sense of the word, but they only present the facts of my experiments. I look forward to your book and hopefully it may shed light on my own facts I derived from my experiments. Good Luck. stealth

[TheoriaApophasis]

Thank you for sharing this! It has always seemed a misty mystery surrounding what magnetism really is to me. Sure we know some of it's properties but what really explains it has seemed lacking.

Based on your research do you believe it is possible to build a device that can generate power with magnets (essentially free energy from magnetism) ?

Kind regards, I should be done within 2 days.


My main trade is translating ancient Greek texts, writing books, however I have always been an inventor and vociferous explorer of unknown (rather not understood) natural phenomena.

I think for my 14th (?) birthday I asked for a Dewar tank and a superconductor Yttrium barium oxide disk and magnet set.


While others try to "squeeze their nonsense" into a "consistent pile of illogical twaddle" (consistent, yet insane, ..illogical) This model of magnetism HAS, and DOES fit the criterion below, ......and of this I am greatly proud to have had enormous free time to experiment, study study study........most of my life without burdens, etc and likewise...


1. Divinely simple

2. Rational

3. Logical

4. Demonstrable to a child

5. Self-consistent

6. Euclidean demonstrably both electrically and magnetically

7. Fit ALL observed phenomena

8. Fit Ockham’s razor analogously

9. Rather than offend the common sense of a even fool like GR and QM does by evoking “virtual photons” and quantum insane hypothetical concept-reifications, the model and explanations must be:
A: necessitated
B: provable
D: explicitly demonstrable
E: undeniably simplex and self-consistent on all levels.




As is the case, I own ALL books on magnetism, most are professional written, ARE consistent, ........... however all are both insane and illogical in their conclusions, and rationally farcical at best usually.

So many "deep thinking but insane" peoples, alas.

which leads to................


“Scientists today think deeply rather than clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite insane. Todays scientists have substituted mathematics for experiments, and they wander thru equation after equation, and eventually build a structure which has no basis in reality.” – Nikola Tesla

[Dingus]

This first edition is only a very tiny section on the history, less than a page.

That's what I was hoping you'd say. Too many books these days seem to be full of needless filler. Even Dollard's Four Quadrant Representation book seemed to have too much fluff for my taste.

[TheoriaApophasis]

Done, BOOK uploaded, 99 pages


2 sizes, small and large (one reduced in image optimization)


www.kathodos.com/magnetism1.pdf 67.9 MB PDF

www.kathodos.com/magnetismsmall.pdf 13.4 MB PDF


Page 30 begins the description of magnetism.


Yes, there is much repetition at times, but this full work is meant as a prequel to a 250+ page book.


Enjoy

[john_g]

Thanks

Hi TheoriaApophasis (Ken)

Many thanks for the book - very generous of you. I've just starting to read it and looking forward to gaining new knowledge.

Kind regards

John

[TheoriaApophasis]

Kind regards to yourself, John.

Understood. Its just the first edition, ...it is complete as it is however.


I however am working on a 5 page extension of it entitled "Forces, Tension, and Induction"

(and ultimately another 30+ pages on Field Incommensurability , Field-charge induction geometry, and action at a distance field pressure mediation)



Fields and induction are circular paradoxes in the telling, from the "cult of Quantum"

If you research induction, they will tell you research fields, and when you research fields, they will tell you its a "force which is an induction'.


Idiocy A leads to idiocy B leads to idiocy C !

It is far far wiser for someone to say "I don't know (we don't know)" than to employ conceptual reifications of fields with "forces" and "induction", and never explain any of them, whatsoever.


"Descriptions, descriptions, descriptions everywhere! But not an explanation to be found!" - Author.

Lux et Veritas



Of course, we could all just nod our heads in agreement with Ricky Feynman (as I call him) and say its all done "by virtual photons"; but then some of us are a bit more evolved than to come to such fantastical pseudo-mystical pontifications.

[TheoriaApophasis]

This is certainly exiting news. I once spent an entire year doing all sorts of experiments with magnets

Now you've got my interest!

Pardon, but after much coaxing from friends that I include the magnetic precession ratios, and angles in the first edition, I cranked out 10 more pages.


They implored me that understanding magneto-dielectric geometry utterly NECESSITATES elaboration on magnetic precession.

In hindsight, they're correct. However I had planned on including that much later, I had to triple check my math , and made 5 more diagrams and detailed descriptions about same,


110 PAGES, and the same links as above, but including the 10 page section:


Magnetic precession rates of the gyromagnetic-ratio at 42.4923 Mhz/T in creating the magnetic vortex
Precessional (vortex) Geometry is also Phi-Phi-1Precession