Project Camelot / Dr. Brian O'Leary Presentation on F-E Suppression

[quantumuppercut]

And Quantumuppercut - I think your method of study is as good as any. When are we going to be 'let in' on your model? I'd love to learn more.

When the validity of your circuit accepted, people will drop mainstream aside to search for a new model. It then begins a new science revolution. Things will be a bit chaostic. I don't plan to present my model. I just use it as a guild to help others.

[jibbguy]

Magnetic Monopole found??

Heres a shocker... German researchers believe they have proof of a magnetic monopole (it would be a first for the mainstream i think, although some parts of Quantum theory predicts it):

Article in PhysOrg:

Magnetic monopoles detected in a real magnet for the first time

Actual Paper:
Science/AAAS | Selected Abstracts

[quantumuppercut]

unify theory for starter

For those who are fans of Tesla, I found this article that best described his long lost "Dynamic theory of Gravity" that never gave out to the world.

http://www.nuenergy.org/pdf/electrinium.pdf

An independant source shows similarity of Tesla's theory. Very compatible and unique.

http://www.initialphysics.org/pdf/Br...26.11.2008.pdf

For freedom,

[witsend]

ABSTRACT FROM Jibbguy's link


Just copied this out for ease of reference. WOW.

[witsend]

Hi Quantumuppercut. I read through the links. A really easy read and definitely inspirational. I want to go through the 'book' again. It's so nice when an entire work is easily accessed. I might tell you it gave me gooseflesh. I'm not sure though about the 'sun' in the centre of the galaxy. So far not observed. But who knows? Perhaps it's in the black hole and the force emanates from there.

I'm not sure that I 'buy into' this explanation - but it's probably because I don't fully understand it. What I do know is that I LOVE TESLA.

Did you read Jibbguy's links? I could only find the abstract and pasted it. I'm not sure that the 'monopole' was found other than at the end of the broken string? I think the heating in the gas just 'described' it. But would like to see the whole exercise. Something like this should definitely be fully available for reference. I think I smell all kinds of patent restrictions here. But who cares. We need that monopole if - indeed - it's been found.

[jibbguy]

Yes sorry about the Paper link, apparently it is so new it's only available at a pay site so far. I suspect within a month or so, or even sooner in this case, it will be on others for free

[quantumuppercut]

Hi Quantumuppercut. I read through the links. A really easy read and definitely inspirational. I want to go through the 'book' again. It's so nice when an entire work is easily accessed. I might tell you it gave me gooseflesh. I'm not sure though about the 'sun' in the centre of the galaxy. So far not observed. But who knows? Perhaps it's in the black hole and the force emanates from there.

I'm not sure that I 'buy into' this explanation - but it's probably because I don't fully understand it. What I do know is that I LOVE TESLA.

Did you read Jibbguy's links? I could only find the abstract and pasted it. I'm not sure that the 'monopole' was found other than at the end of the broken string? I think the heating in the gas just 'described' it. But would like to see the whole exercise. Something like this should definitely be fully available for reference. I think I smell all kinds of patent restrictions here. But who cares. We need that monopole if - indeed - it's been found.

hi witsend,
Thanks for the comments. I felt too high of value. The truth is my background aren't that great about physics and math. I'm not even an electrician. That's why I can only read simple stuffs and do limited experiments. If you give me a phoenix, I might mistake it as a duck. lol My quest is to search for the answer within high school knowledge. Anything higher than that I will have to break it down. Most of the stuff I learn is through conciousness.

You must think I'm into magnetic monopole. Actually the question of fundamental particle has been solved to my satisfaction. Fundamental particle cannot exist in reality, however, it does exist in theoratical view. What is the different? We can use to calculate than predict things. The reason why fundamental particle cannot exist in reality is because I believe in fractals. When you think electron is the smallest, wait until you break it. Actually, the electron did break into 2 photons I believe. Just like they used to say atom is the smallest. The problem was that the world "atom" is a philosophy. We now take it as "electrons circle about a nucleus", which destroy the philosophy entirely. But in term if fractals, when you know the pattern, you will understand the nature of any particle and how they works.

Eh... magnetic monopole. I see the earth as a monopole.. with the exception of dead north and south pole. I think something weird is happening there. An electron charge is a monopole. Oh, one might ask why am I mistaken magnetic field for an electric field. ehehehe.... they are the same thing. One with linear while the other is vortex geometry.

So in summary to this monopole article, I just think that we have taken simple concept and see it in a complex way. Same with casimir effect, relativity, quantum physics, string theory... well, in short, anything that I think is too complex for high school Sorry witsend along with physics professors... it is just my opinions.

Anyway, very nice to discuss things to my heart content without being held to qualification. Thanks witsend.

[witsend]

Hi Quantum. I'm like you. Entirely without qualifications. That just makes our interest in the subject a little more extreme because we've still got so many questions.

Jibbguy - I've written to one of the authors Jonathan Morris. He's going to send us the link as soon as it's 'free'. Didn't give us a time for this but I've got a feeling it'll be soon. I also think it's going to hit the headlines. This really is a breakthrough.

I think you must rename this thread 'Anything goes'. It's moving into new developments rather than suppressed info. Still. I'm enjoying the directionlessness. How's that for a new word.

[jibbguy]

Hehehe, i like that word, if my high school councilor had known of it, i am sure he would have used it

... But do not be so sure it really is without "direction" (*grins knowingly*) .

Yes you're right it is odd that a thread about the suppressions of the mainstream corporate media, academia, and science would show so many peer-reviewed Papers that would seem to argue against the existence of such suppressions in the first place....

But they are hardly a drop in the bucket, and do not really yet address the practical aspects so needed to end fossil fuel's reign: I think that part of the job may be left mostly up to us, i'm afraid

To gain allies and mentors in the Theoretical realm will be "easy".. Doing so in the Engineering world will be harder by an order of magnitude!

But at least we can learn from these, take the concepts and think about them in our own contexts, and take comfort that knowing there are those besides us who are not chained to the mainstream thought patterns... And are willing to risk careers and credibility to do controversial work in the first place.

[witsend]

I know what you mean about the difference between engineers and physicists. The latter are still open minded - as a rule. I think the 'intractable' nature of engineers is because, as a rule, they lack a firm foundational training in physics. It should be compulsory.

Jibbguy I've been looking at the mission statement of New Energy Congress. These guys have really got a handle on new technologies. Have you read up on this? Valone is connected - may be a founding member or even their president. Not sure.

[quantumuppercut]

To gain allies and mentors in the Theoretical realm will be "easy".. Doing so in the Engineering world will be harder by an order of magnitude!

So if the goverment says: " Here's your lab, pick your best team around the world, these companies can provide you magnets of any size, shape; coils of any size shape; top of the line resistors, diode, transistors, and best electronic components. Can you engineer a free energy device by the end of this year?" Who do you think in here will step up? Are we ready? If the answer is no, continue what we been doing.

[quantumuppercut]

Hi Quantum. I'm like you. Entirely without qualifications. That just makes our interest in the subject a little more extreme because we've still got so many questions.

I thought you're famouse around the world, or the free energy world. Anyway, my path has been much narrowed since I started the free energy quest. So far my model is almost complete, after that is to crunch in numbers and have it exactly match mainstream constants. A bit of frustration there, that's why I'm still lingering. It's the moment of truth! lol I did test it out and solved Coulomb's constant using Newtorian mechanic. Still not gain enough confident. I can tell you that the equation E^2=m^2c^4+p^2c^2 can stranslate to total conserved energy = total momentum + total kinetic energy. Almost there. Crossing my fingers.

[witsend]

Lol. No Quantum. Let me disabuse you. I'm NOT famous around any world. Just a certain amount of infamy on a couple of threads.

And I've also got my fingers crossed. That's a really promising equation if it works.

[quantumuppercut]

Lol. No Quantum. Let me disabuse you. I'm NOT famous around any world. Just a certain amount of infamy on a couple of threads.

And I've also got my fingers crossed. That's a really promising equation if it works.

Lol I have to tell you. This is the first free energy device that has a back up theory and replicatable on first try. Unlike TPU, Besslerwheel, magnets motor, etc..etc.. , this circuit determine the fate of science. Now we all know that free energy is just a matter of sooner or later. Matter of fact, if it's not officially announce by the end of this year... I'll talk 1 sentense less.

[jibbguy]

Quantum, regarding your Q as to if "unlimited means" were available (assuming it was not suppressed as well lol), "could i do it in a year?"...

I believe that i could.

But since funding is no limit; i would not choose just one avenue either... I would hedge bets and setup at least 3 concurrent programs; each aimed at different applications / sectors of the economy.

> I would fund Dr. Kiril Chukanov to replicate & perfect his a "neighborhood powering"-sized reactor vessel (output around 800kW total), plus larger sizes, for generating power from Quantum Ball Lightening (lol don't call it "Plasma".. he is adamant that is it NOT plasma). It has significant byproducts of heat and Hydrogen from the process besides direct electricity which could be used for other stuff as well. This tech would mainly be aimed at centralized power production and large commercial applications / factories.

> I would collect the best folks available and re-create the Stanley Meyer work, in both on-demand Hydroxy production, and vehicle-sized plasma / hydroxy injectors. I would force G.E. & Xogen to give up what they have on it too, to speed results. This tech would mainly be aimed at vehicle / transportation applications, and large desalination plants (which after several years, could be more efficiently powered by LENR Cold Fusion reactors.. Not in one years though lol).

> I would have a another team first recreate the Dr. Gerhard Beyer / Howard Johnson's magnetic 3-D mapping work from Virginia Tech in the 1980's, then use that data to design and build all-magnet motors of different sizes and considerable torque for home energy production... With another side concurrent project for manufacturing specially-shaped anisotropic magnets for this purpose... These would be CERAMIC mags which although larger, heavier, and not as long-lasting as Neo's.. Could be mass produced in ANY quantity without any Rare Earth elements being required. This tech would be aimed mainly at residential & small business energy applications.. With the side benefit of creating a significant support industry for magnet "re-gaussing & replacement" for additional Middle Class jobs, and the use of Ceramics insures no one can "corner" the magnet market, and all third-world countries can manufacture them themselves).

Costs to do this..?

Let's say about 400 scientists and engineers total (plus 1,600 support personnel), considerable resources and square feet..... Tons & tons of the best equipment, instrumentation, materials, and accessories.

Rough estimate, about $3 Billion for that year

Less than the cost of a few "F22 Raptor" jet panes.

Commercialization of the devices would pay for it all in less than 6 months... then zoom to the moon profit-wise.... As production geared-up to meet the totally insane demand, after 2 years of intense production tooling-up; sales of $500 billion to 1 Trillion could be expected world-wide... The only limits there being the production capacity.

This is taking into consideration the large amount of "Open Source" manufacturing also happening on the side... these markets are so huge, it doesn't matter if poor countries get the tech "for free" when for non-commercial applications... Only if someone wants to make money from it, should they have to pay any Royalties (which will be small charges anyway).

Sales of fossil fuels could expect to "significantly lessen" lol... MUHAHAHAHA.